SCIENCE PLAN
International
Pacific Research Center
Version 4.0
February 18, 2003
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
IV. INDO-PACIFIC
CLIMATE (THEME 1)
B. Identify
the oceanic and atmospheric processes that modulate ENSO on decadal time scales
C. Extratropical
air-sea interactions and feedbacks
V.
REGIONAL-OCEAN INFLUENCES (THEME 2)
C. Determine
the role of the East-Asian marginal seas and of the Indonesian Throughflow on
the A-AMS
VI.
ASIAN-AUSTRALIAN MONSOON SYSTEM (THEME 3)
A. Understand
the monsoon annual cycle and intraseasonal variability
B.
Determine
the causes of interannual-to-interdecadal monsoon variability
C. Understand
the role of atmosphere-ocean-land interactions in monsoon predictability
D. Understand
the monsoon hydrological cycle and its impact on Asian-Pacific climate
VII.
IMPACTS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE (THEME 4)
A. Determine
the impacts of changing external forcing on Asia-Pacific climate
D.
Asia-Pacific
Climate Data Center
XI. RELATIONSHIP
TO OTHER PROGRAMS
The International Pacific Research Center (IPRC) was established in the School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST) at the University of Hawaii (UH) in October, 1997, under the “U.S.-Japan Common Agenda for Cooperation in Global Perspective” as a collaborative global-change research effort between Japan and the United States. Its purpose is to provide an international research environment dedicated to improving understanding of the nature and predictability of climate variability in the Asia-Pacific sector, including the influences of global environmental change within the region.
The IPRC Science Plan
defines the Center’s overall structure.
It states the IPRC mission, presents four scientific themes and goals,
describes specific objectives, and outlines strategies for attaining them. The goals of each theme are:
·
To
understand climate variations in the Pacific and Indian Oceans on interannual-to-interdecadal
time scales
·
To
determine the influences on Asia-Pacific climate of western-boundary currents,
the Kuroshio/Oyashio Extension system, marginal seas, and the Indonesian
Throughflow
·
To
understand the processes responsible for climatic variability and
predictability of the Asia-Australian Monsoon System and its hydrological cycle
at intraseasonal through interdecadal time scales
·
To
identify the relationship between global environmental change and Asia-Pacific
climate
These goals contribute to international
efforts under the World Climate Research Programme and the International
Geosphere-Biosphere Programme.
The Center’s overall
research strategy emphasizes diagnostic studies, modeling, and data
assimilation, and the IPRC will ensure that the necessary computational
resources and data-management capabilities are available for these
activities. Formal mechanisms of
external guidance and oversight are provided by the IPRC’s Scientific Advisory
and Implementation Committees.
This Science Plan is
intended to be a guidebook for the maintenance and development of scientific
activities at the International Pacific Research Center (IPRC). In this section, the IPRC mission is
defined, scientific themes and goals are presented, and specific objectives are
listed. The overall strategy for
attaining these objectives, which emphasizes numerical modeling and data
analysis, is presented in Section II.
The objectives, their scientific rationales, and specific strategies are
then discussed in detail in Sections III-VI.
Personnel and infrastructure requirements are presented in Section
VII. Mechanisms for internal management
and external guidance are outlined in Section VIII. Finally, IPRC activities are placed in the context of other
institutions and research programs in Sections IX and X.
The Asia-Pacific sector is subject to substantial short-term natural climate variability, and is both affected by and contributes to global environmental change. Currently, about 57% of the world’s population lives in this region, and these climatic signals cause considerable stress on its inhabitants. Thus, understanding the Asian-Pacific climate system is of great societal importance, and warrants a concentration of scientific effort and resources to accelerate progress. The IPRC is devoted to this research effort. Its mission is:
To provide an
international, state-of-the-art research environment to improve understanding
of the nature and predictability of climate variability in the Asia-Pacific
sector, including regional aspects of global environmental change.
At the present time, the
IPRC is the only research organization dedicated to this important
mission. As such, it is a necessary
component of a complete, global-change research strategy, which must rely on a
network of cooperating institutions throughout the globe.
While the Mission of the
IPRC is expected to endure, the particular research activities conducted
through the IPRC will likely evolve, as deemed appropriate by IPRC scientists,
and its Scientific Advisory and Implementation Committees. Current activities are divided into four
basic themes:
THEME 1: Indo-Pacific ocean climate
THEME 2: Regional-ocean influences
THEME 3: Asian-Australian Monsoon system
THEME 4: Impacts of global environmental change
Consistent with the IPRC
Mission, these themes are focused on Asia-Pacific climate issues, each
emphasizing different subregions or processes.
They are also important for global climate issues, since some Asia-Pacific
phenomena are known to remotely force climate variability outside the region.
The IPRC will strive to
contribute to each of these themes. The
level of activity within each theme, however will likely vary, however,
depending on the areas of expertise of IPRC scientists and on the availability
of resources.
Each theme has a goal that
broadly outlines its subject matter.
Here, the goals of each theme are presented, together with lists of
questions that illustrate key scientific issues.
GOAL 1: To understand climate variations in the Pacific and
Indian Oceans on interannual-to-interdecadal time scales
Questions to be considered
within this broad goal are:
·
What
are the oceanic and atmospheric processes that determine midlatitude Pacific
decadal variability?
·
Does
the atmosphere respond to midlatitude sea-surface temperature (SST) anomalies,
and if so how?
·
What
are the pathways by which heat and salt are exchanged among the tropical,
subtropical and subpolar regions of the Pacific Ocean?
·
How
do the wind-driven and buoyancy-forced circulations interact to determine these
pathways?
·
What
are the oceanic and atmospheric processes that cause ENSO decadal variability?
·
How
is the tropical thermocline maintained and perturbed by subtropical
forcing? Are equatorial SST anomalies
determined in part by subtropical forcing?
·
What
are the nature and causes of Indian-Ocean SST variability on
interannual-to-decadal time scales.
GOAL 2: To determine the influences on Asia-Pacific climate of western-boundary
currents, the Kuroshio/Oyashio Extension system, marginal seas, and the
Indonesian Throughflow
This goal complements the
preceding one. Like Goal 1, it involves
understanding fundamental oceanic processes, but it focuses on the
western-boundary region of the Pacific Ocean and its marginal seas. Questions that relate to this goal are:
·
What
is the nature of the ocean-atmosphere interactions in these regional
oceans? How strongly do they influence
Asia-Pacific climate?
·
What
determines variations of the Pacific western-boundary currents?
·
What
role do these currents play in the interactions among the subarctic,
subtropical and tropical circulations?
·
How
does the Pacific general circulation interact with coastal and East Asian
marginal seas?
·
What
factors determine the strength, vertical structure, and water-mass composition
of the Indonesian Throughflow?
·
What
are the dynamic and thermodynamic processes that cause variability in the
Kuroshio/Oyashio Extension region? How
do the ocean and atmosphere interact in this region, which is known to exhibit
large SST and oceanic heat-content anomalies.
·
What
processes are involved in the formation and circulation of North Pacific
Intermediate Water?
GOAL 3: To understand the processes responsible for climatic variability and
predictability of the Asia-Australian Monsoon System (A-AMS) and its
hydrological cycle at intraseasonal through interdecadal time scales
Questions for this goal can
be divided into two major groups, depending on time scale. Questions involving
intraseasonal-to-seasonal time scales are:
·
Why
is the Asian monsoon characterized by sudden changes (singularities) at
specific geographic locations?
·
What
causes active-break sequences of the monsoons?
·
How
are intraseasonal oscillations (ISOs) related to monsoon onset and withdrawal?
·
Why
does the equatorial Indian Ocean appear to be a source region for boreal summer
ISOs?
·
Why
do summertime ISOs propagate northward in the Indian Ocean while northwestward
over the western North Pacific?
·
What
are the linkages between ISOs and monsoon interannual variability?
·
Are
intraseasonal variations of the monsoon predictable?
·
What
roles do land-atmosphere and ocean-atmosphere interactions have in determining
the A-AMS hydrological cycle?
·
What
roles does the hydrological cycle play in the monsoon active and break periods?
Those that involve
interannual-to-interdecadal times scales are:
·
What
are the dominant modes of natural climatic variability of the A-AMS?
·
Are
there coupled ocean-atmosphere-land modes of interannual-to-interdecadal
variability that are intrinsic to the A-AMS?
·
What
mechanisms cause interannual-to-interdecadal variations of the monsoons?
·
Are
remote influences from the Pacific and Indian Oceans important for these
variations?
·
If
so, which oceanic regions are most closely linked with monsoon variability?
·
Do
monsoonal variations in turn affect remote oceanic regions?
·
What
are the limits of predictability of the A-AMS climate variability on
interannual-to-interdecadal time scales?
·
How
do monsoon variations affect predictability of global climate variations?
GOAL 4: To identify the
relationships between global environmental change and Asian-Pacific climate
Questions for this goal are:
·
How
does the mean state and variability of the A-AMS depend on the mean state of
the global climate system?
·
How
is Asia-Pacific climate affected by changes in levels of atmospheric CO2 and
aerosols, land cover, and land-use practices?
Each of the
themes and associated goals has objectives that define specific scientific
activities that are possible to achieve within a finite time interval and with
well-defined resources. Objectives for
Theme 1 and Goal 1 are:
OBJ. 1.1: Identify the ocean-atmosphere processes that cause
decadal variability in the extratropical North Pacific
OBJ. 1.2: Identify the oceanic and atmospheric processes that
modulate ENSO on decadal time scales
OBJ. 1.3:
Determine the oceanic processes that maintain the Pacific-Ocean general
circulation and that cause its climatic variability
OBJ. 1.4:
Determine the nature and causes of Indian-Ocean SST variability on
interannual-to-decadal time scales
Objectives for Theme 2 and
Goal 2 are:
OBJ. 2.1: Determine the
processes that maintain the Kuroshio, Oyashio and their Extensions and that
cause their climatic variability.
OBJ. 2.2: Identify the
processes that maintain the low-latitude western-boundary currents of the
Pacific Ocean and that cause their climatic variability.
OBJ. 2.3: Determine the influences of the East-Asian marginal
seas and the Indonesian Throughflow on the Asia-Pacific climate system
Objectives for Theme 3 and
Goal 3 are:
OBJ. 3.1: Understand the monsoon annual cycle and intraseasonal variability
OBJ. 3.2: Determine the causes of interannual-to-interdecadal variability of the
monsoon
OBJ. 3.3: Understand the role of atmosphere-ocean-land interactions in monsoon
predictability
OBJ.
3.4: Understand the monsoon
hydrological cycle and its impact on Asia-Pacific climate
Objectives for Theme 4 and
Goal 4 are:
OBJ. 4.1: Determine the impacts of changing external forcing
on Asia-Pacific climate
OBJ. 4.2: Determine the sensitivity of the Asia-Pacific
climate system and hydrological cycle to changes in land-surface
characteristics
These objectives summarize
research activities that are ongoing, or expected to be implemented, at the
IPRC. As such, they provide a
foundation for planning and decision-making.
Their scientific rationales and strategies for achieving them are
discussed in Sections III-VI.
A complete strategy for
climate research includes: i) short-duration,
intensive process studies; ii)
long-term observations; iii)
diagnostic studies; iv) modeling; and
v) prediction. Process studies increase understanding of
particular mechanisms believed to be of critical importance. Long-term observations are essential for
identifying important modes of climate variability and for model
validation. Diagnostic studies look for
relationships among different elements of the climate system, providing
evidence for or against existing theories or leading to new ones. Models provide a means for testing
hypotheses, for identifying key processes, and for suggesting areas of further
observational study. Prediction, the
raison d’être for climate research, provides the ultimate test of success in
all the research areas. Progress is
most rapid when there is active interaction among scientists working in all of
these areas.
The IPRC research strategy
emphasizes two of the above categories, namely, diagnostic studies and
modeling, relying on research carried out elsewhere for support in the other
areas. For this reason, a continuous
communication between IPRC and external scientists working in these other areas
is important for the Center’s success (Section IX). Indeed, it is expected that the IPRC will provide a valuable
resource for the other climate activities, helping to identify the need for
future process studies, to assist in the development of the long-term climate
observing system, and to improve climate models used for prediction.
Goals of the IPRC diagnostic
studies are: i) to augment the basic
description of the A-AMS; and ii) to
identify basic modes of climate variability.
The success of this effort requires easy access to relevant datasets,
including historical data (also proxy data), new in-situ and space-based
observations, and model-based analyses of observations obtained by data
assimilation. To ensure their
availability, the IPRC will maintain the Asian-Pacific Data Research Center
(see Section VII).
Overall
goals of the IPRC modeling activity are: i)
to identify the processes that cause Asia-Pacific climate variability; and ii) to determine how much of this
variability is predictable. Modeling
activities therefore include: a)
development of models that can realistically simulate the oceanic and
atmospheric general circulations and their variability; b) the development of coupled models; c) design and implementation of numerical process experiments; and d) use of existing models in
collaboration with scientists at other institutions, which will hasten the
development of IPRC model development.
This broad range of modeling
activities, and the complexity of the phenomena being studied, requires the use
of a hierarchy of models of varying types and dynamical sophistication. Such models include:
·
Simple
and intermediate, oceanic, atmospheric and coupled models to develop and refine
hypotheses and to verify results from general circulation models (GCMs)
·
High-resolution,
limited-domain, oceanic models with specified atmospheric forcing to study
regional processes, particularly the role of marginal seas in the A-AMS
·
Basin-scale
oceanic GCMs with specified atmospheric forcing to examine the effects on
Asia-Pacific climate of processes such as the thermohaline circulation,
water-mass formation, and remote circulation variations
·
Global
atmospheric GCMs forced by specified SST fields
·
High-resolution,
limited-domain atmospheric models embedded in a global GCM
·
Coupled,
global atmospheric and limited-domain oceanic GCMs to refine parameterizations,
determine and reduce systematic errors, and study the role of surface processes
·
Coupled,
global oceanic and atmospheric GCMs (land, atmosphere, ocean, ice) to study
coupled interactions, global/regional processes, and long-term variability
The IPRC will seek to use
actively as many of these model types as possible. In the near future, however, the IPRC will not likely have either
sufficient manpower or computing resources to maintain all these models,
particularly those near the end of the list.
(Section VIIC describes the existing computer system and its
capabilities.) The IPRC researchers
will therefore seek to collaborate with external modeling groups to expand its
resources.
Solutions to coupled models
imply that slowly evolving oceanic processes are an essential part of the
dynamics of long-term variability. It
is therefore important to estimate the oceanic state as precisely as possible
both to identify key processes and to enhance climate predictability. A large number of improved data sources
(e.g., TAO array, satellite-based SST, SSH, winds and VOS XBT/XCTD) and data
sets (e.g., Levitus, 1994), da Silva, 1995) have emerged in recent years. Nevertheless, most of these data provide
reliable estimates only of the directly measured fields like temperature and
salinity, whereas the values of some crucial quantities like sea surface fluxes
and transports remain quite uncertain.
Furthermore, accuracy of the data (especially ocean-atmosphere fluxes)
on climatological time scales is often inadequate to force ocean models
reliably during long-term integrations.
Data assimilation (i.e.,
model/data synthesis) presents a natural way to reduce these data deficiencies,
by fitting the data into a dynamically consistent framework using oceanic and
atmospheric models. Its benefits
include:
·
Interpolation
and extrapolation of sparse data sets
·
Providing
a “best” estimate of the oceanic or atmospheric state given the available data
·
Validation
of models within a framework that allows statistical testing of hypotheses
In addition to these direct
benefits, data assimilation often leads to
·
Improvement
of model parameterizations, by identification of regions of significant
model/data error
·
Identification
of relationships (teleconnections) between aspects of climate system that are
not directly observed, by correlation analyses of optimally synthesized fields
·
Efficient
design of field experiments, by providing an accurate estimation of the oceanic
state
The IPRC will utilize data assimilation
as a basic research tool in several of its planned activities.
1. Observations: At decadal time scales, there
are clear associations between oceanic and atmospheric variables in the North
Pacific. For example, decadal SST anomalies have their largest amplitudes in
the midlatitude North Pacific rather than the tropics, and are linked with the
Pacific-North American (PNA) atmospheric pattern (Graham et al., 1994; Deser et
al., 1996; Latif and Barnett, 1994). In
the northwestern Pacific, the ocean thermal structure lags changes of
atmospheric forcing in the central Pacific by up to five years (Miller et al., 1998, Deser et al., 1999).
In addition, distinct modes of decadal variability have been identified using a
variety of statistical techniques (e.g., Latif and Barnett, 1994, 1996; Latif
et al., 1997, Solomon et al. 2002).
Recently, two different modes of Pacific decadal variability have been
identified by Nakamura et al. (1997) and Nakamura and Yamagata (1999). One is
confined to the North Pacific with SST anomalies centered on the Subarctic
Front; the other extends into the tropics of both hemispheres with largest SST
anomalies on the Subtropical Front. (Nakamura and Yamagata, 1999, also discuss
a third mode, but it is concentrated in the midlatitude marginal seas, and so
more relevant to the research in Section IVC.)
2.Models: Prominent aspects of Pacific decadal variability have already been simulated in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. In the central North Pacific, decadal SST changes appear to respond primarily to air-sea heat fluxes, and hence are largely forced by internal atmospheric variability (Barnett et al., 1999; Pierce et al., 2001; Schneider et al., 2002). In the Kuroshio-Oyashio extension region, both SST and thermocline-depth anomalies are influenced by ocean dynamics (Pierce et al., 2001), reflecting the delayed adjustment of the thermocline to changes in the basin-wide wind stress (Xie et al., 2000; Seager et al., 2001; Schneider et al., 2002). In a number of coupled model simulations, the passive, non-local oceanic response to stochastic atmospheric forcing accounts for the simulated decadal variability without midlatitude ocean-to-atmosphere feedback (Frankignoul et al., 2000; Schneider et al., 2002). This is in contrast to earlier studies that suggest active ocean to atmosphere coupling (Latif and Barnett, 1994, 1996; Münnich et al., 1997; Xu et al., 1998; Weng and Neelin, 1998; Jin et al., 1998). In this scenario, ocean-atmosphere coupling in the northwestern ocean provides positive feedback, an atmospheric teleconnection (like the PNA) is established that forces the northeastern ocean, and Rossby waves are excited in that region that then radiate back to the northwestern ocean to provide negative feedback.
Other studies suggest that decadal variability originates in the tropics, with higher-latitude variability resulting from ENSO-like atmospheric teleconnections (Yukimoto et al., 1996, 1998; Knutson and Manabe, 1998). A third idea is that the northeastern subtropics is an important region of positive feedback (Kleeman et al., 1999; Solomon et al., 2003), an idea that is supported by the "wave-action" analysis reported in Nakamura and Yamagata (1999). A fourth idea is that global coupled ocean-atmospheric interactions are important for decadal climate variability (Meehl et al., 1998).
3. Hypotheses: Several specific processes have been hypothesized to be involved (Miller and Schneider, 2000). The ‘null’ hypothesis explains the preponderance of low frequency variance as the oceanic response to air-sea fluxes of heat, fresh water or momentum due to intrinsic atmospheric variability. Other hypotheses postulate coupling of the subpolar and subtropical ocean circulations with storm-track variability. Another is changes in the shallow, meridional circulation cells that link the subtropical, tropical and subpolar regions (see Sections IIIB and IIIC). A third invokes coupling to the atmosphere associated with the formation, circulation, and dissipation of North Pacific Intermediate Water (NPIW). A fourth is anomalous oceanic heat storage that feeds back with some delay to produce subtle but persistent atmospheric forcing (Lau and Nath, 1990; Alexander, 1992a,b), possibly with heat-content anomalies being advected around the Pacific gyre circulations (Meehl et al., 1998). In fact, Pacific decadal variability likely involves a number of these, and other, processes that interact in complex ways.
4. Strategy: The IPRC strategy for exploring Pacific decadal variability includes both diagnostic studies and a variety of modeling experiments. Diagnostic studies, which extend previous work like that of Nakamura et al. (1997) and Nakamura and Yamagata (1999), will locate more precisely key regions of ocean-atmosphere interaction and describe modes of variability in greater detail. Based on the historical development of ENSO theory and modeling, it is likely that advances in understanding will emerge from a suite of solutions to a hierarchy of coupled models: Solutions to simple and intermediate models will isolate key processes; solutions to highly resolved, coupled GCMs will validate the assumptions inherent in the simpler systems, and simulate climate variability more accurately. In addition, it will be necessary to conduct experiments with uncoupled models in order to elucidate the individual roles of atmospheric and oceanic processes. For example, how the atmosphere responds to midlatitude SSTAs (if at all) is not well understood (Section C). Studies with atmosphere-only models forced by specified SSTA distributions or surface heat fluxes are needed to resolve this issue. Likewise, studies with ocean-only models are needed to clarify how the ocean responds to midlatitude wind-stress and heat-flux anomalies. In particular, it is important to determine the remote influences of Rossby waves generated by these midlatitude forcings in the eddy-rich North Pacific.
1. Observations: Decadal variations of ENSO have been extensively documented in recent years (Trenberth and Hurrell, 1994; Graham, 1994; Kleeman et al., 1996; Latif et al., 1997). This interest has been stimulated by the long-lasting negative excursion of the Southern Oscillation in the early 1990s, which among other things has been linked to the devastating drought in Northeast Australia during the same period (Kleeman et al., 1996). At the same time, decadal variability in the North-Pacific midlatitudes has attracted much attention (Trenberth and Hurrell, 1994; Mann and Park, 1996; Nakamura et al., 1997; Nakamura and Yamagata, 1999). Data analyses suggest further that decadal variations in both regions are linked (Latif et al., 1997; Nakamura et al., 1997; Nakamura and Yamagata, 1999; Kleeman and Power, 1998; Meehl et al., 1998), implying that ENSO decadal variability involves interactions between the midlatitudes and tropics.
2. Tropical/midlatitude interactions: At interannual time scales, there is strong evidence that the primary interactions are directed from the tropics to midlatitudes: ENSO is known to be generated primarily by tropical ocean-atmosphere coupling, and this variability is then communicated to higher latitudes largely by atmospheric teleconnections. Indeed, during ENSO events variability of the Pacific North American (PNA) atmospheric teleconnection pattern is remotely forced mainly by anomalous tropical-atmospheric heating in this way. Although the PNA atmospheric teleconnection is the most important pathway, oceanic pathways are likely to be regionally important: One such pathway is poleward of Kelvin waves along the eastern boundary; another is anomalous poleward Ekman transport during ENSO events.
At decadal time scales, the generation region of Pacific climate variability is not yet clearly defined (Section IIIA). Most studies, however, support the idea that it is generated at midlatitudes, and if so then the decadal interactions are directed from midlatitudes to the tropics. Barnett et al. (1999), for example, conclude that a midlatitude-to-tropics teleconnection accounts for the ENSO decadal variability in their coupled solution; specifically, wind anomalies generated at midlatitudes extend far enough into the tropics to force the ocean circulation there. Other researchers have pointed toward oceanic teleconnections as being the interaction mechanism (Gu and Philander, 1997; Kleeman et al., 1999). As discussed next, the basic idea in these studies is that midlatitude processes alter the circulation that carries cool, subsurface water into the tropics, namely, the North Pacific Subtropical Cell (STC).
3. North Pacific STC: Sverdrup theory provides a vertically averaged (barotropic) picture of the Pacific general circulation that nicely illustrates the large-scale horizontal gyres, but it completely masks the baroclinic exchange of water masses between them. A useful way to illustrate these exchanges is by zonally averaging the flow. In the North Pacific, the zonally averaged circulation exhibits two shallow (z < 1000 m) meridional overturning cells. One of them, the North Pacific STC, consists of subduction in the subtropics, equatorward transport of salty thermocline water into the tropics, equatorial upwelling, and a return flow of near-surface water to the subtropics (McCreary and Lu, 1994; Liu et al., 1994; Lu and McCreary, 1995; Hirst et al., 1996; Lu et al., 1998). The other, the North Pacific Subpolar Cell (SPC) involves subtropical subduction, subsurface flow into the subpolar ocean, upwelling there via Ekman suction, and southward flow of near-surface water (see Section IIIC3; McCreary and Lu, 1994; Lu et al., 1998). Zonal averaging is conceptually revealing, but it greatly oversimplifies the actual three-dimensional pathways associated with the various branches of these cells (Lu et al., 1998); see Section IIIC for a brief description of some of these pathways.
4.
Mechanisms: In the coupled solution of
Kleeman et al. (1999), midlatitude wind-stress anomalies change the transport of the STC. Specifically, they excite Rossby waves that
reflect from the western boundary as coastal and equatorial Kelvin waves,
thereby propagating midlatitude signals into the tropics; there, they alter the
tropical thermal structure, and in particular modify the size and/or strength
of the equatorial cold tongue. A
similar oceanic teleconnection is present in the coupled solution of Yukimoto
et al. (1998). Alternately, Gu and
Philander (1997) hypothesized that midlatitude heat-flux anomalies alter the temperature of the equatorward-flowing
branch of the STC, and that these anomalies are eventually advected to the
equator to affect the cold tongue. This
idea is supported by Deser et al. (1996) who reported a subsurface temperature
anomaly circulating within the North Pacific STC, and by Bingham and
Lukas (1994) who discussed anomalous advective transports of heat and salt by
the NEC and the Mindanao Current. On
the other hand, Schneider et al. (1999a,b) argue otherwise, commenting that the
Gu and Philander (1997) mechanism does not explain much of the observed
tropical temperature variability. Their
analysis, however, leaves open the possibility
that some of the temperature variance is compensated by salinity anomalies such
that density remains unchanged: In contrast to the dynamically active
temperature anomalies cited above, such salinity-compensated temperature
anomalies are a passive tracer in the ocean (Liu and Shin 1999), but, upon
upwelling to the surface, they can initiate a coupled adjustment of the tropics
(Schneider 2000).
5. Strategy: To understand ENSO decadal variability, it is perhaps most important to obtain solutions to coupled models that can simultaneously simulate both decadal and ENSO variability, and then to diagnose the causes of each oscillation and of the interactions between them. Given the differences among existing coupled solutions it is highly unlikely (at least initially) that any single model will adequately simulate all aspects of Pacific decadal variability. The IPRC strategy will therefore be to utilize a variety of coupled systems, of varying types and degrees of sophistication.
1. Introduction: Ocean-atmosphere interaction and feedback are of fundamental importance for understanding and modeling the climate and its variability. Development of a general understanding for these coupled dynamics is still in an infant stage. For example, processes determining the partition between atmospheric and oceanic transports of heat and fresh water are not understood. Simple balance relations (e.g., Cessi, 2000) give some guidance, but have not been rigorously tested. Decadal variability of the climate system, besides being an important topic in its own right (Sections IIIA and IIIB), offers a window into these coupled dynamics, as low frequency variability is possibly associated with a shift in the roles of the atmosphere and ocean in balancing the earth’s heat budget. This Objective is also closely related to Objectives IIID and IIIE, as its achievement requires knowledge of how the oceanic circulation is maintained and of the processes that drive its variability.
2. Extratropical ocean-to-atmosphere feedback: The atmospheric response to SST or surface heat-flux anomalies lies at the heart of understanding the ocean’s role in climate. Since the ocean performs a significant fraction of the poleward heat transport, this response must be important for the coupled state, at least at low frequencies such as decadal. Most of the published work, however, suggests that the response of the extratropical atmosphere to the ocean is weak and/or difficult to detect (see Kushnir et al., 2002). Recent satellite observations, however, show a strong and ubiquitous response of the atmospheric boundary layer to SST variability associated with oceanic mesoscale activity (Xie et al., 1998; Chelton et al., 2001; Nonaka and Xie, 2002), hinting at an ocean-to-atmosphere feedback. The underlying hypothesis relies on increased vertical mixing in the atmosphere in response to warm anomalies of SST. On the planetary scale, idealized GCM experiments indicate that the extratropical storm tracks respond strongly to SST anomalies, resulting in changes in near-surface baroclinicity (Inatsu et al. 2002). The exact dynamics for the atmospheric adjustments and their influence on the large-scale coupled system are unknown.
3. Coupled
response to ocean heat transport: To determine the low-frequency atmospheric response,
atmospheric models are typically forced by prescribed SST patterns. This methodology is successful in the
tropics, where SST largely determines the state of the atmosphere. In the extratropics, however, this approach
is questionable for two reasons. First,
mid-latitude SST anomalies are largely a response to atmospheric internal
variability, and only in special areas such as the Kuroshio extension does the
ocean appear to force low frequency anomalies of SST. Second, the lack of SST adjustment to air-sea heat fluxes
unrealistically constrains the atmosphere to the least damped mode of
variability (Barsugli and Battisti 1998).
An alternative approach prescribes perturbations to the mixed-layer heat
budget that reflect anomalies due to ocean heat transports. SST anomalies are allowed to interact freely
with the atmosphere through air-sea heat exchange. Yulaeva et al. (2001) and Sutton and Mathieu (2002) utilized this
approach in atmospheric GCMs coupled to slab-ocean models, by prescribing
anomalous oceanic heat flux convergences.
Both found a significant atmospheric response with non-local adjustments
of surface temperatures.
4. Strategy: Available data sets, in
particular satellite derived products with high time and space coverage, will
be used to seek further observational evidence for ocean-to-atmosphere
coupling. Fundamental dynamics of the
observed feedbacks between SST and the atmospheric boundary layer will be explored
using high resolution atmospheric general circulation models forced by observed
and idealized, SST or heat-flux anomalies.
Implications of this coupling for coupled ocean atmosphere modes and
decadal climate variability will be explored using a hierarchy of model
integrations, varying from coupled model simulations (albeit of low resolution)
to oceanic models that include effects of this coupling in an idealized
way. As an example of a model of the
latter sort, Behringer et al. (1979) explored how oceanic advection might force
the Gulf Stream recirculation through the SST effect on the wind stress; this
effect, closely related to the aforementioned satellite observations, leads to
a sharpening of the front between the subpolar and subtropical gyres.
The coupled responses to ocean heat fluxes, including the storm track response, will be explored using experiments with AGCMs coupled both to slab and full-physics ocean models. Coupled atmosphere-slab ocean models will be employed to explore the sensitivity of the atmosphere to the changes of the mixed-layer heat budget, for example by including anomalous mixed-layer Ekman advection, a process implicated in decadal North Pacific variability (Miller et al., 1994; Seager et al., 2001; Schneider et al., 2002). These models will also be used to explore the coupled response to prescribed ocean heat fluxes in the Kuroshio-Oyashio extension region, an area of interest to Theme II. Finally, drastic sensitivity experiments will be performed, for example, by removing ocean heat transports altogether (Seager et al. 2002).
Coupled
AGCM-slab ocean model experiments will be contrasted with similar solutions to
fully coupled ocean-atmosphere GCMs, to help to identify feedbacks of ocean
dynamics that are important to coupled variability. For example, is variability in the subtropical gyres or the
shallow Subtropical Cells (STCs) essential?
Oceanic heat transports (Trenberth and Caron 2001) are largest
equatorward of 30 degree of latitude, suggesting an important role of the
STCs. In the tropics, the latent-heat
flux is the major means for the ocean to balance the solar radiation, resulting
in fresh water flux at the surface. The
STCs play an important role in the fresh-water transport that is needed to
balance this surface flux. Is this
fresh-water transport important for the behavior of the coupled system?
1. Introduction: As
noted in Sections IIIA and IIIB, hypotheses for Pacific decadal variability
involve changes in oceanic circulation that extend at least to the depth range
of upper-intermediate water (NPIW). Specifically, circulations that have been
suggested to be of particular importance are the shallow meridional cells that
link the subtropics to tropical and subpolar oceans (the STC and SPC,
respectively) and the western-boundary currents associated with them. To
achieve the first three objectives of Theme 1, then, it is necessary to
understand the processes that account for decadal variations of these basic
features of the Pacific general circulation. This, in turn, requires knowledge
of the processes that maintain the mean flows as well.
2.
Subtropical mean circulation: To illustrate the scope and complexity of the
mean flows in the subtropical ocean, consider the actual pathways followed by
water in the equatorward branch of the STC as it moves from the subtropics to
the equator. After water subducts into the thermocline in the subtropics, it
first circulates about the perimeter of the Subtropical Gyre, and then flows
westward as part of the North Equatorial Current (NEC). At shallower depths,
some of it crosses the latitude band of the ITCZ to flow directly to the
equator in the interior ocean (Liu et al., 1994; Rothstein et al., 1998). Most
of it, however, flows completely across the basin where it bifurcates near the
Philippine coast, feeding the Kuroshio to the north and the Mindanao Current to
the south (see Section IVB; Lu and McCreary, 1994; Lu et al., 1998). Some of
the Mindanao-Current water joins the NECC, some exits the basin via the
Indonesian Throughflow, and some joins the EUC, eventually upwelling in the
eastern, equatorial ocean. Note that the Mindanao Current plays a key role in
the exchange between the Subtropical and Tropical Gyres; indeed, it is
analogous to the upper branch of the Hadley circulation associated with the
A-AMS that ties together the atmospheric subtropical and tropical circulations.
Some NPIW also participates in this circulation, apparently with most of it
leaving the basin in the Throughflow (McCreary and Lu, 1999). The STCs have
slowed down for the last 20 years (McPhaden and Zhang), in response to changes
of the wind stress (Nonaka et al. 2002).
3. Subpolar
mean circulation: Less is known about the three-dimensional structure of the
SPC, but like the STC it involves zonal circulations that extend throughout the
subpolar and subtropical oceans (Lu et al., 1998). Essentially, the SPC is
driven by southward Ekman drift across the southern boundary of the Subpolar
Gyre (near the line of zero wind curl). A subsurface, northward flow is
generated to balance this surface mass loss, and the SPC is closed via
open-ocean upwelling due to Ekman suction by negative wind curl. The subpolar
gyre can be roughly divided into the two gyres, namely, the Western Subarctic
Gyre to the west of the dateline, and the Alaska Gyre to the east; the two
gyres are linked by the Alaskan Stream to the north and (a northern part of)
the North Pacific Current to the south. Just where the subsurface flow crosses
into subpolar ocean is an open question. In the McCreary and Lu (1994) and Lu
et al. (1998) modeling studies, it all occurs via the western-boundary current.
Their models, however, lacked a realistic Mixed Water Region and Kuroshio
Extension (Section IVA). It is more likely that the actual exchange takes place
via eddy processes in the Mixed Water Region, or farther to the east where the
Kuroshio Extension jet weakens and broadens to merge with the large-scale,
interior Sverdrup circulation (Qu et al., 2000a). Strong evidence in
support of the northward-flowing, subsurface SPC branch is the existence of a wintertime temperature inversion, with warm saline
water beneath cold fresh surface water (Watanabe, 1998); moreover, the warm subsurface
water has a density of 26.7-27.2 sigma theta throughout the Western Subarctic
Gyre, a range consistent with that in the northern part of the North Pacific
Current (Ueno and Yasuda, 2000). Finally, the mixed-layer thickness has a large annual cycle
in the subpolar ocean because of the strong wintertime cooling there.
Mixed-layer processes are therefore likely to be an important part of SPC
dynamics and thermodynamics. An impediment to progress is that the mixed layer
is poorly represented in models of the subpolar region.
4. Variability: Little is known about the nature or causes of decadal variability in such intergyre circulations. Analogies with annual and interannual variations point toward the importance of Rossby-wave propagation, and remote forcing. For example, TOPEX observations show energetic annual Rossby waves west of the dateline (Chelton and Schlax, 1996), likely forced by local trade wind variations and in the eastern ocean; moreover, year-to-year differences in their strength are reflected in the magnitude of the sea-level anomalies associated with them (Mitchum and Lukas, 1990). Likewise, there is evidence that Rossby-wave propagation from the eastern boundary of the basin is involved in Pacific interannual variability (Jacobs et al., 1994). Modeling studies also point to the importance of Rossby-wave propagation in decadal variability (see Sections IIIA and IIIB). As noted in Section IIIB, there are also indications that advection of subsurface temperature and salinity anomalies by the STC, presumably generated earlier by surface heat-flux variations at midlatitudes, is involved.
5.
Strategy:
5.1 Types of models: A hierarchy of Pacific-Ocean (and Indo-Pacific) models will be used to address this objective. A major part of the effort, however, will be to develop a highly resolved oceanic GCM that is able to simulate accurately the Pacific currents that are believed to be climatologically important. In particular, GCM solutions will obtained that are able to simulate all possible exchange circulations among the subpolar gyre, subtropical gyre and tropical circulation (such as the STC and SPC noted above). The model will have fine enough resolution to be able to investigate the influences of mesoscale variability on transportation of heat and fresh water fluxes in the surface and intermediate layers.
5.2 Model improvements: Based on prior
experience, we expect that solutions to the models will be able to simulate
fundamental aspects of the Pacific general circulation, but will likely misrepresent
subtler aspects of the flow (such as the subsurface branches of the STC and
SPC). A well-known cause of such problems is the parameterization of mixing
processes (both vertical and horizontal mixing) and the surface mixed layer,
and a concerted effort will be made to improve mixing schemes. In addition,
data assimilation will be used to produce a "best" representation of
the Pacific general circulation. Solutions with and without assimilated data
will then be compared to help identify specific model weaknesses. This effort
will require development of data-assimilation methods.
1. Introduction: The influence of the Indian
Ocean on Asia-Pacific climate is less clear than it is in the Pacific. It is generally felt that it must be important, but there is no
dominant Indian-Ocean ocean-atmosphere phenomenon (like ENSO in the Pacific) that irrefutably demonstrates its
importance.
2. SST anomalies: Recently, however, there
have been a few studies that suggest the importance of Indian Ocean SST
anomalies. Nicholls (1989) linked
Australian rainfall variability with an SST anomaly dipole pattern, with one
center of action over Indonesia and the other in the southeastern tropical
Indian Ocean. Strong southern
Australian winter rainfall occurs when SST is anomalously warm (cold) in
Indonesia (the southeastern Indian Ocean) and vice versa. The time series associated with the dipole
is not correlated with the Southern Oscillation Index, and so it is independent
of ENSO. There are also considerable
interannual SST variations in the Arabian Sea, with cool (warm) SST anomalies
corresponding to strong (weak) monsoons.
Modeling work, however, suggests that these SSTAs are a response to the monsoon variability, and
do not feedback significantly to affect it.
Most recently, Krishnan and Mujumdar (1999) have demonstrated that
Indian rainfall variability is significantly correlated with SST anomalies in
the southwestern Indian Ocean, and
Goddard and Graham (1999) have shown that these anomalies affect rainfall in
East Africa.
3. Dynamics:
3.1 Climatological situation: The likely reason there is not a prominent ENSO-like
response in the Indian Ocean is that the climatological winds are weak and
westerly near the equator. Typically,
then, the Indian Ocean does not develop a cold tongue in the eastern,
equatorial ocean. Indeed, the shallow,
meridional circulation cell in the Indian Ocean that corresponds to the Pacific
STC is a cross-equatorial cell that
involves coastal, rather than equatorial, upwelling along the coasts of
Somalia, Oman and India (McCreary et al., 1993).
3.2 Extreme events: There are events, however, when easterly winds do appear along the
equator. Their appearance seems to be
part of a general northward shift of the southern-hemisphere trades. Occasionally, the easterly anomalies are
large enough to produce a remarkably large oceanic response, associated with
strong upwelling off Somalia and in the eastern, equatorial ocean, and low sea
level throughout the eastern ocean.
There have been three major events of this sort in the past 50 years,
during 1961, 1994 and 1997, and they were associated with droughts in Indonesia
and high rainfall in the western Indian Ocean and Africa (Vinayachandran et
al., 1999; Murtugudde et al., 1999).
Smaller events have occurred throughout this time period, but were not
strong enough to draw the attention of the scientific community. One explanation for such events is that they
are a response to forcing external to the Indian Ocean that requires the
Southeast Trades to shift northward.
Murtugudde et al. (1999) and Yamagata et al. (1999) have suggested that
they might also be a natural mode of the climate system intrinsic to the Indian
Ocean itself.
4. Strategy: There are beginning to be a number of modeling studies that look at
the causes of Indian-Ocean SST anomalies (Murtugudde and Busalacchi, 1999;
Behera et al., 1999). The IPRC will
participate in this effort using ocean-only and coupled models. The ocean-only models will be forced with a
variety of interannual wind and heat-flux products. In addition, it is well established in solutions forced by
climatological forcing (e.g., Han et al., 1999) that Indian Ocean SST is
sensitive to the parameterization of the surface mixed layer. Therefore, solutions will be obtained in
models with different mixed-layer schemes.
Coupled systems that explore the influence of Indian-Ocean SST anomalies
will be developed using regional Indian-Ocean and global-ocean models.
The overall goal of this
theme is to investigate regional oceanic phenomena that are known (or believed)
to be important in the variability of the large-scale oceanic gyres and in
climate. These phenomena include
eddy-mean current interactions in western-boundary currents, cross-frontal
exchange, water-mass formation (e.g., Subtropical Mode Water and North Pacific
Intermediate Water), and interactions with coastal/marginal seas. These processes are all involved in
intergyre exchange, and inter-ocean exchange in the case of the Indonesian
Throughflow. It is expected that this
research effort will lead to enhanced predictability of the Pacific large-scale
circulation, as well as of the regional ocean circulations themselves (e.g.,
the Kuroshio meander).
1. Introduction:
Western-boundary currents are of special interest for climate issues because
they transport so much heat and salt, and because they are primary pathways of
intergyre communication. In the North
Pacific basin, the Kuroshio and the Oyashio are the western-boundary currents
associated with the subtropical and the subpolar gyre, respectively. They join off the coast of Japan, forming
the Mixed Water Region where a large amount of intergyre exchange appears to
take place (Yasuda et. al., 1996; Ueno and Yasuda, 2000). They then flow eastward to form the Kuroshio
and Oyashio Extensions that export heat, salt, and tracers into the ocean
interior. Decadal SST variations have
been found to be most pronounced in the midlatitude North Pacific, rather than
the tropics, particularly in the Kuroshio/Oyashio Extension regions, and they
are linked to the PNA (Deser et al., 1996; Yasuda and Hanawa, 1997; Nakamura et
al., 1997).
2.
Kuroshio: The Kuroshio flows
poleward from the NEC bifurcation, transporting a large amount of heat and salt
into the midlatitude ocean. Where it
flows off the edge of the East China Sea, its transport is about 30 Sv and its
variability is relatively small (Kagimoto and Yamagata, 1997). However, where it enters into the Shikoku
basin south of Japan, its transport increases to be about 60 Sv on average, and
it can sometimes be as large as 100 Sv (Imawaki et al., 1997), indicating the
formation of a recirculation gyre there.
It is well known that the Kuroshio exhibits a peculiar decadal
variability south of Japan, having either a large meander or a straight
path. Recently, it was proposed that
internal nonlinear dynamics of the subtropical gyre, involving the
recirculation gyre, may cause such bimodality at decadal time scales (Qiu and
Miao, 2000). Besides this long-term
variability, large transport fluctuations are also caused by cyclonic and
anticyclonic eddies that originate in the Kuroshio Extension region (Ebuchi and
Hanawa, 2000; Mitsudera et al., 2000a) in addition to eddies that originate
from the south (Ichikawa, 2000). The
eddies collide with the Kuroshio, causing large fluctuations in the Tokara
Strait south of Kyushu (Feng et al., 2000), and sometimes trigger meanders
(Yoshikawa et al., 1998; Mitsudera et al., 2000a). A recent numerical simulation has reproduced all the observed phases
of such meander formation (Waseda et al., 2000a, b, c).
The warm water
advected by the Kuroshio produces a sharp ocean-land thermal contrast, thus
causing a severe wintertime East-Asian monsoon. Heat is released to the atmosphere in the Kuroshio and adjacent
regions, and during the winter this release results in the formation of
Subtropical Mode Water (STMW). Recent
analysis shows that the core temperature of the STMW has a close relationship
with the East Asian monsoon at interannual time scales, while at decadal time
scales it is linked to the Subtropical Gyre strength with lag of several years
(Hanawa, pers. comm.).
3.
Oyashio: The Oyashio
transports cold and fresh water from the north. Its water mass originates in part from the Bering Sea, flowing
southward as the East Kamchutska Current (approximately 10 Sv), and some from
the Sea of Okhotsk (about 3 Sv). The
exchange of water between the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Okhotsk is likely to
involve both mesoscale eddies (Yasuda et al., 2000) and strong tidal mixing
(Nakamura et al., 2000). An important
property of the Okhotsk outflow is its low potential vorticity. The low-potential-vorticity water flows into
the Mixed Water Region across the boundary between the subpolar and subtropical
oceans, subducts below the Kuroshio Extension, and is an important element in
the formation of NPIW (Yasuda et al., 1996).
Indeed, in the climatological mean, the Oyashio overshoots the gyre
boundary southward by more than 5º (Qu et al., 2000a). The dynamics of this remarkable southward
penetration involves a density current associated with the fresh and
low-potential-vorticity Okhotsk water over continental slope (Mitsudera et al.,
2000b).
The Oyashio also
exhibits decadal-to-interdecadal variations in its southward penetration scale,
which causes large anomalies in SST and subsurface temperature off the eastern
coast of Japan (Sekine, 1988; Miller et al., 1998). These temperature anomalies further impact biological activity
and fisheries in the western North Pacific.
This variability is linked to the basin-wide wind-stress field, and
hence the Oyashio is hypothesized to provide an essential feedback mechanism in
the dynamics of North Pacific decadal variability (Section IIIA).
4.
Kuroshio and Oyashio Extensions: The
Kuroshio Extension is formed when the Kuroshio separates from the Japanese
coast at about 35ºN and enters the open basin of the North Pacific. It consists of an eastward-flowing inertial
jet accompanied by large-amplitude meanders and vigorous pinched-off
eddies. In this region, the Sverdrup
constraint on the integrated mass transport no longer holds, due to deep
recirculation gyres located south (and possibly north) of the Kuroshio
Extension, and the eastward transport of the Kuroshio Extension can attain
values three times larger (approximately 130 Sv) than the surface baroclinic
transport (Wijffles et al., 1998).
Long-term satellite altimeter measurements during the past decade have
revealed that its eastward surface transport and zonal-mean position changed
coherently on interannual time scales, with a larger eastward transport
consistently corresponding to a more northerly position of the Kuroshio
Extension and vice versa. In addition,
both of these changes appear to be related to the strength of the southern
recirculation gyre (Qiu, 2000).
The Oyashio Extension
(or the Subpolar Front) extends northeastward from 38ºN near the coast of Japan
to 40-45ºN offshore (Qu et al., 2000a), its offshore location being close to
the line of zero wind curl, consistent with Sverdrup theory (Hurlbert et al.,
1996). Mixed-layer drifters reveal that
eastward jet of the Oyashio Extension has a width and surface mean speed
similar to those of the Kuroshio Extension, but it is more steady and probably
more barotropic (Maximenko et al., 1998, 2000). In contrast to the front across the Kuroshio Extension, the
Subpolar Front is density-compensated across the Oyashio Extension, in spite of
the large difference in water properties (Yuan and Tally, 1995; Zhang and
Hanawa, 1993).
In the Mixed Water
Region, subtropical and subpolar waters are mixed and spread in the subtropical
gyre to form NPIW. In addition, the
Kuroshio Extension broadens as it flows east, consistent with the Sverdrup constraint
(Qu et al., 2000a). A part of this
water may flow poleward across the gyre boundary to form a subsurface
temperature and salinity maximum (mesothermal layer) in the subpolar gyre (Ueno
and Yasuda, 2000), providing another pathway of intergyre exchange.
5.
Importance: Obtaining a better
understanding of the Kuroshio and Oyashio system is important to climate
research for a number of reasons.
5.1 Large heat anomalies: The Kuroshio Extension and its recirculation gyre exist in
a region where the oceanic transfer of heat to the atmosphere is extremely
large. Thus, any large-scale changes in
the Kuroshio Extension system are likely to modify the air-sea heat fluxes as
well as SST (Qiu, 2000).
5.2
Strong oceanic variability: The Kuroshio/Oyashio region contains strong
jets and eddies. In addition to the
interannual variability in the eddy field, the Kuroshio, the Oyashio, their
Extensions, and recirculation gyres undergo large-scale variations in paths and
transports on interannual-to-decadal time scales. The Kuroshio bimodality is one of these events. These variations may be caused by basin-wide
wind anomalies (Yasuda and Hanawa, 1997), self-sustained nonlinear dynamics
associated with the recirculation gyre (Qiu and Miao, 2000), buoyancy fluxes
due to winter cooling (Huang, 1990), or stochastic forcing by mesoscale eddies.
5.3.
The STMW heat reservoir: The STMW provides a large heat reservoir, which
may influence SST when the STMW is ventilated during winter.
5.4
Exchange pathways: The Mixed Water Region is a major crossroads of oceanic
currents, which allows two-way (i.e., both north-to-south and south-to-north)
exchange of water between the subtropical and subpolar oceans.
5.5 Mixing processes: Large amplitude fluctuations observed in the vertical
profiles of temperature and salinity in the Mixed Water Region suggest that a
broad spectrum of processes are active in modifying water properties. These processes include instabilities,
breaking waves, geostrophic adjustment, lateral interleaving, and cabbeling
(Talley et al., 1995; Maximenko and Shcherbina, 1996).
5.6 Air-sea interactions: There is evidence that interannual climate variations in
East Asia and the western North Pacific may be controlled in part by local and
simultaneous air-sea interactions over the Kuroshio and Oyashio Extensions,
with an atmospheric pattern resembling the Western Pacific pattern (Hanawa et.
al., 1989; Wallace et. al., 1990).
Recent studies further indicate the importance of air-sea interactions
in the Kuroshio-Extension region.
6.
Strategy:
6.1. Data
analysis: Relatively large
amounts of data are accessible in the Kuroshio/Oyashio region. A high-resolution, isopycnally averaged,
hydrographic data set is proving to be very helpful in analyzing water-mass
properties there (e.g., Qu et al., 2000a).
We will combine this historical data set, with XBT data, WOCE data, and
various satellite products to investigate interannual-to-decadal variations of
water masses, eddies, fronts, and gyres.
The combined data set will also be great use for numerical modeling and
data assimilation.
6.2. Numerical
modeling: The Kuroshio and
Oyashio are narrow and strong flows whose variability is influenced by local
nonlinear processes as well as by basin-wide, remotely forced variability. Furthermore, the western rim of the Pacific
Ocean has complex coastline and bottom-topographic features associated with
marginal seas and ridges, so that the interaction with such topographic
features and water exchanges are key elements to understand the variability of
this region. These complexities require
a hierarchy of models, varying from highly simplified, regional systems to
highly resolved GCMs that resolve the bathymetry and the narrow jets and cover
at least the Pacific Ocean in its entirety.
Idealized experiments as well as hindcast and predictability experiments
will be conducted. The Kuroshio
bimodality and the intensity of the Oyashio southward penetration may be useful
measures for evaluating model performance.
These studies will allow us not only to assess potential predictability
of the ocean, but also lead to model improvements and the identification of key
processes.
6.3 Data
assimilation: Data synthesis and
ocean-state estimation incorporating various assimilation methods with
hierarchy of models will also be carried out.
The linkage between data and models in data-assimilation studies
provides a quantitative means for assessing model performance, for improving
model physics (e.g., mixing physics, air-sea interaction processes) and for
estimating parameter values.
1. Introduction: In the Pacific Ocean, the
low-latitude western boundary currents (LLWBCs) consist of the Mindanao Current
(MC), the New Guinea Coastal Current (NGCC), and the New Guinea Coastal
Undercurrent (NGCUC). They have been
shown to play an important role in the development of El Niño/Southern
Oscillation (ENSO) events (Lukas and Lindstrom, 1991; Webster and Lukas, 1992),
and for this reason, considerable attention was paid to them during the TOGA
and WOCE programs. Since the early
1990s, interest in LLWBCs has increased further due to the long-lasting
negative excursion of the Southern Oscillation, which among other things has
been linked to Pacific decadal variability (Trenberth and Hurrel, 1994; Kleeman
et al., 1996; Nakamura et al., 1997).
Several hypotheses to account for this variability involve changes in the
shallow, meridional circulation cells that allow exchange of waters between the
main oceanic gyres, namely the STCs (McCreary and Lu, 1994; Liu et al., 1994; see IIIC). Variability in their equatorward-flowing
branches have been proposed as a slow oceanic process that provides a link
between subtropical and equatorial variability (Gu and Philander, 1997; Kleeman
et al., 1999; Nonaka et al., 2000; see IIIA).
2. Overview: In the North Pacific, much of the subsurface STC branch flows to the
equator via an LLWBC, namely, the Mindanao Current (MC). This current is fed by the North Equatorial
Current (NEC), which bifurcates at the Philippine coast, some flowing
equatorward as part of the STC and some returning northward to join the
Kuroshio and eventually to recirculate in the Subtropical Gyre. A recent data analysis suggests that the
subsurface Luzon Undercurrent along the east coast of Luzon also participates
in the equatorward branch of the intermediate layer (Qu et al., 1997,
1999). The latitude of the NEC
bifurcation thus provides a possible measure of the strength of the North
Pacific STC.
In the southern hemisphere,
the LLWBC consists of the South Equatorial Current (SEC) and the
NGCC/NGCUC. About half of the
subsurface branch flows to the equator via the NGCC/NGCUC, while the rest flows
through an interior pathway (Johnson and McPhaden, 1999). The location of the bifurcation determines
how much SEC water bends equatorward to flow into the equatorial region and how
much turns poleward to return to the subtropics via East Australian Current. More detailed properties of the
southern-hemisphere bifurcation are not yet known.
The water in the LLWBCs
converges equatorward, and is redistributed in the western equatorial Pacific
by the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) to form the equatorial thermocline and by
the North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC).
Another important aspect of the region’s circulation is that some of the
water is lost to the Indian Ocean in the Indonesian Throughflow (IT), making
the LLWBCs a key component of the global thermohaline circulation (Gordon,
1986; Godfrey et al., 1993). The IT
contributes to the heat budget of the Indian Ocean because of its warm
temperature (e.g., Qu et al., 1994), and recent studies have revealed its
importance in the evolution of “dipole mode” events there (Saji et al., 1999).
3. Goals:
3.1. Intergyre interactions: The latitude of the NEC bifurcation provides a
possible measure of the strength of the intergyre interactions. A number of factors will influence the
location of the bifurcation latitude, for example, the winds throughout the
interior of the Pacific Ocean (McCreary and Lu, 1994), ENSO (Qiu and Lukas,
1996), the Indonesian Throughflow, the South China Sea circulation (e.g., Qu et
al., 2000b; Lebedev and Yaremchuk, 2000), and mixing (Miyama et al, 2000). Furthermore, bifurcation of the SEC in the
southern hemisphere is much less known.
Under this topic, goals are
therefore to: i) describe how fluxes
of properties are driven across gyre boundaries, and assess how “leaky” the
gyres are; ii) determine how the NEC
and SEC bifurcations vary in depth and time; iii) understand how the tropical and subtropical gyres interact
near western boundaries where the geometry and mixing processes are highly
complicated; and iv) examine how
bifurcation variability is related both to local forcing such as the
Australasian Monsoon and to remote forcing such as variations in STC strength.
3.2.
LLWBC variability: Generally, the accumulated historical hydrographic observations have
allowed us to gain a rather reliable view of the mean circulation in the
western equatorial Pacific (e.g., Gouriou and Toole, 1993; Fine et al., 1994;
Qu et. al., 1999; Lebedev and Yaremchuk, 2000). Their variability, however, has not been adequately observed or
modeled with respect to interannual variability, and in some areas not even
with respect to the annual cycle. Until
recently, there have been almost no moored, direct current measurements in the
LLWBCs south of 20°N and west of 147°E, the sole exception being observations
of intraseasonal variations of the IT reported by Kashino et al. (1999). To date, there have been no direct
time-series measurements of the MC, and even the phase of its annual cycle is
unknown. Our best estimate of the mean
transport of the MC is based on only 8 quasi-synoptic sections poorly
distributed with respect to seasonal and interannual variability (Wijffels et
al., 1995). Clearly, further
observations and analyses are necessary.
Here, goals are to: i) determine to what extent the steady
circulation is consistent with Sverdrup dynamics; ii) study variations in LLWBC transport, determining what drives
them and how their dynamics differ in character between seasonal and decadal
events; iii) study variations in
properties (salinity, tracers) advected by the LLWBCs, in order to determine
what role the LLWBCs play in exporting heat and freshwater from the tropics; iv) determine how LLWBC water-mass
properties are altered by mixing and/or entrainment; and 5) determine how
important mesoscale eddies are in the redistribution of heat, salt and tracers
in the western equatorial Pacific and to the IT.
4. Strategy: Developing a better understanding of LLWBCs is thus essential for
understanding tropical climate variability, and it has been identified as a key
CLIVAR objective. We will carry out a
suite of data analyses, numerical modeling and data assimilation studies
designed to develop a comprehensive description of the upper- and
intermediate-ocean circulation in the tropical western Pacific. Additionally, we will seek to identify key
oceanic processes involved in LLWBC variability.
4.1. Data analysis: Data analyses will be conducted to develop a
three-dimensional picture of the mean circulation and water mass distribution
in the tropical western Pacific (using historical data), to examine their time
variability across particular latitude or longitude lines (using repeated
hydrographic and/or XBT measurements), and to provide a basis for subsequent
model validation. In contrast to
previous climatological analyses (e.g., Levitus, 1982), we will: i) average the data along isopycnal
rather than pressure surfaces to avoid artificial smoothing of properties at
depths near the pycnocline (Gouriou and Toole, 1993); and ii) use a 0.5° by 0.5° grid with an e-folding smoothing scale
generally less than 200 km to resolve the LLWBCs adequately. This approach has proven to yield improved
results in comparison to averaging along pressure surfaces particularly in the
western boundary regions (Qu et al., 2000a).
4.2. Numerical experiments: In order to identify processes that maintain the
LLWBCs and that cause their variability, we will carry out various numerical
modeling experiments. We are currently
implementing POM and several different layer ocean models (LOMs) in an Indo-Pacific
basin configuration. Taking advantage
of the LOMs’ efficiency, we will conduct a large number of experiments using
the LOMs to identify key forcing regions and parameters. The POM version of the model has 41 sigma
levels and a telescoping grid as fine as 0.33º in the North Pacific western
boundary region and Indonesian Archipelago; the model is designed to focus on
western boundary processes. The STC
theory of McCreary and Lu (1994), which separates the ocean into various
dynamically distinct regimes, provides a guide for these experiments. Furthermore, sensitivity tests to surface
forcing fields will be conducted using reanalysis products (ECMWF and NCEP) and
satellite products (ERS, QuickSCAT, SSM/I and TRMM). Validation against subsurface observations is initially planned
on the subsurface salinity maximum in the subtropical South Pacific Ocean. This maximum extends all the way into the
western equatorial Pacific under the surface warm pool where TRITON buoys are
making salinity measurements from surface to 750 m. Salinity profiles obtained by ARGO will also be used when
available.
4.3. Data assimilation: To estimate and analyze LLWBC variability, we will
implement an advanced version of the Singular Evolutive Extended Kalman (SEEK;
Pham et al., 1998) filter that is
capable of feeding the model with information from various data sources. Wavelet-based error estimation methods will
also be incorporated (Jameson and Waseda, 2000). The data sets to be assimilated into the model include SSH from satellite
altimeters (TOPEX/JASON); SST from AVHRR and TRMM; temperature, salinity and
ADCP data from TRITON/TAO buoys in the equatorial Pacific; drifting-buoy data;
and upper-ocean data from XBT/CTDs, ARGO buoys and WOCE sections. The data assimilation will constrain the
model toward a more realistic representation of the Pacific circulation,
enabling a better understanding of the STCs, bifurcation latitudes, and LLWBCs,
and of their influence on the equatorial ocean.
The
North Pacific marginal seas include the Okhotsk Sea, the Japan Sea, the East
China and Yellow Seas, and the South China Sea. The variability of these marginal seas is generally as poorly known
as for the western-boundary currents.
Recent observational programs are beginning to alleviate this
situation. Among them, we are primarily
interested in the Okhotsk Sea and the South China Sea because these two seas
are thought to be potentially important for climate changes.
The
Indonesian archipelago, where the Indonesian Through Flow exists, is the most
important adjacent sea in the Indo-Pacific region with respect to the global
ocean circulation.
1. Marginal seas:
1.1
Okhotsk Sea: The Okhotsk Sea has peculiar water
properties compared with other marginal seas of the western Pacific. There is a temperature minimum at about 100m
deep due to winter convection on the shelf, when relatively fresh water caused
by river influx occupies the upper 100m, followed by sharp halocline. Drifting ice covers the sea for almost six
months because of the upper fresh water and severe winter monsoon. Knowledge of the circulation in this sea is
still incomplete. Variability is almost
completely unknown except for that of ice coverage observed from satellites.
The
Okhotsk Sea is an important sea in relation to climate from several
reasons. First, it is thought to
provide a source water of NPIW, which is an important component of inter-gyre
exchange between the subtropical and the subarctic gyres. The Sea is connected to the Pacific Ocean
through several deep straits, among which the deepest one is the Bussol’ Strait
at 46.5N which accounts for 40% of the outflow transport across the Kuril
islands. Low potential vorticity (PV)
mode water is formed in the vicinity of the islands that flows out from the
straits forming eddies, leading to a density (or PV anomaly)-driven current of
Oyashio (Yasuda et. al., 1999). The low
potential vorticity water is hypothesized to form due to either winter
convection or tidal mixing. Second, SST
near the Bussol Strait becomes as low as 5ºC even during the summer. This low temperature is likely to be an
appearance of subsurface water due to tidal mixing (Awaji, personal communication). Coupling with northeasterly winds associated
with an atmospheric blocking high, called the Okhotsk High, is often situated
over the sea during summer. This low
SST may cause cold summers, called Yamase, in the Northeastern area of Japan
(Rikiishi and Iida, 1990). Third, there
are substantial variability in sea ice coverage in the Okhotsk Sea due to wind
stress changes. This can cause a large
heat flux anomaly from the ocean to the atmosphere in winter, which can then
feedback to cause changes in the atmospheric circulation (Honda et. al.,
1997).
There
are several hydrographic surveys adjacent to the Kuril islands conducted by
Japanese Fisheries Agency associated with SAGE. A few current meter
measurements also take place in the western boundary of the Okhotsk sea
by Japanese researchers.
1.2
South China Sea: The South China Sea is
believed to have a particularly important influence on the A-AMS. The combination of complex geometry of the
basin, together with the overlying reversing monsoon, gives rise to
complicated, highly time-dependent circulations with several eddy
features. Furthermore, its circulation
is influenced strongly by the western Pacific Ocean circulation. Until recently, even the seasonal cycle of
its circulation is not fully described
(Qu et al., 2000b). Since the
South China Sea is an important sea for the monsoon onset, which strongly
influences the jet-stream position over East Asia and the Northwest Pacific
during summer, mixed-layer dynamics and variability of the circulation due to
local and remote forcings should be further explored.
SCSMEX has been conducted in 1998 to
investigate air-sea interaction during the monsoon onset in the South China
Sea. ATLAS buoys are being moored in
the sea by Taiwan researchers as a part of the program.
2. Indonesian Throughflow:
2.1
Importance:
The complex straits and seas of the Maritime Continent allow a strongly
variable flow from the Pacific to the Indian Ocean, the Indonesian Throughflow
(see Lukas et al., 1996, and Godfrey, 1996, for reviews). The Throughflow is dynamically and
thermodynamically important because its heat transport alters the heat budget
in the western Pacific warm pool as well as in the Indian Ocean. Furthermore, it is an important component of
the global ocean thermohaline circulation (Gordon, 1986). The observed link between summer-monsoon
rainfall and SST anomalies in the eastern Indian Ocean north of Australia
(Nicholls, 1995) suggests a linkage between the monsoons and Throughflow
variations.
2.2
Modeling background: A number of modeling studies have explored the
influence of the Indonesian Throughflow on Pacific and Indian Ocean
circulations. Hirst and Godfrey (1993)
and by Vershell et al. (1995) conducted numerical experiments using global
ocean models with and without the Throughflow and reported significant
differences in both basins. Schneider
(1998) compared solutions to a coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM with and without
the Throughflow. With the Throughflow,
SST increased in the eastern Indian Ocean and decreased in the equatorial
Pacific. These changes shifted the
western Pacific warm pool and centers of atmospheric deep convection westward,
affecting atmospheric pressure throughout the tropics and, via atmospheric
teleconnections, in midlatitudes as well.
As a result, the surface wind stress changed in the tropics,
strengthening the tropical currents in the Pacific Ocean and weakening them in
the Indian Ocean. However, the precise
role of the Indonesian Throughflow in causing these changes was not addressed
because of the model limitation.
3. Strategy: There are factors peculiar to the marginal seas and the
Indonesian Throughflow that make them particularly difficult to model. First, since one goal of this research topic
is to study interactions with the Pacific large-scale flows, the models must
include the Pacific basin and in the case of the Indonesian Throughflow the
Indian Ocean as well. Second, they must
all have a high horizontal resolution in order to resolve the complex
bathymetry of the marginal seas. (The
recent experiments of Metzger and Hurlburt, 1996, underscore the potentially
important influence that complex bathymetry can have on oceanic
circulations.) Third, they must also
have sufficient vertical resolution to be able to handle properly the strong
vertical shears that can develop due to complex topography and small
straits. High vertical resolution is
also needed to adequately model the very thin surface mixed layer that can
result from intense rainfall and river runoff.
Both high vertical and horizontal resolution is needed to realistically
simulate the intense coastal upwellings that occur in various locations during
different phases of the monsoon.
Fourth, the ocean model must include a realistic surface mixed layer, that
is able to model effects due to salinity/freshwater flux variations, which are
known to influence the upper-ocean heat budget and thus air-sea interaction in
these highly convective regions.
Finally, exceptionally strong tidal mixing which is observed to occur
within the Maritime Continent and neighboring boundary regions, will require
the use of a special mixing scheme.
Given
this complexity, it is anticipated that model development will be a particular
challenge. The IPRC modeling strategy
will therefore be to develop several types of models for this purpose. The strategy will also involve close
comparison of observations from such field programs as ARLINDO (Indonesian
Throughflow program), SCSMEX, and the developing Pacific North Equatorial
Current bifurcation experiment. In
parallel, marginal-sea SST sensitivity studies using AGCMs, such as the work of
Ose et al. (1996) for the South China Sea, will help determine the potential
impact of improved marginal sea modeling on the predictability of regional
climate variability
The A-AMS is the most
energetic component of the Earth’s climate system. It covers the vast monsoon regions of South Asia, East Asia,
Australia, East Africa, the tropical Indian and western Pacific Oceans, and the
Asian marginal seas (e.g., South China Sea).
Its aperiodic and large-amplitude variability has considerable societal
and economic impacts on the local inhabitants.
There is also increasing evidence that the A-AMS prominently influences
global climate. Fluctuations of monsoon
rainfall affect the midlatitude jet stream of the winter hemisphere (Lau and
Boyle, 1987), and these impacts ripple all the way around the planet.
The East Asia-western
Pacific monsoon has unique features and a disproportionate influence on the
global climate. The western Pacific is
a major heat source for the interannual variations of the global climate system
associated with ENSO. East Asia is the
core region of the most powerful winter monsoon on the Earth that involves
strongest tropical-extratropical interaction.
In view of its specific importance
to global climate variability and regional economics, the study of the East
Asian-Western Pacific monsoon is a distinctive research focus of A-AMS at IPRC.
This section outlines the
four objectives of the IPRC monsoon research program. They concern intraseasonal-to-seasonal and
interannual-to-interdecadal monsoon variability, and influences of
land-atmosphere-ocean interactions and the hydrological cycle.
1. Annual cycle:
1.1 Background: A thorough description and understanding of the A-AMS climatological
annual cycle is necessary background information for the study of monsoon
variability. The broad-scale features
of the monsoon annual cycle including onset, active and break periods and
associated migration of organized convection are well documented, and the roles
of the Tibetan Plateau (Li and Yanai, 1996) and of Indian-Ocean SST variations
(Shukla and Fennessy, 1994) in the evolution of the South Asian monsoon have
also been recognized. Yet, the physical
processes that determine many specific and regional features still remain
unknown, especially regarding the hydrological cycle.
Heating gradients associated
with convection and longwave radiation are the primary driving force for the
monsoon circulation. Particular
attention should therefore be paid toward identifying the processes that
determine the annual march of heat and moisture sources in the region (Yanai
and Tomita, 1998). During the onset,
development, and withdrawal of the summer monsoon, the convection centers
migrate along preferred pathways (Meehl, 1987; Wang, 1994), sometimes
continuously but at other times with sudden “jumps” (Tao and Chen, 1987; Nitta,
1987; Lau and Yang, 1996). In some
variables and at some locations, the amplitude and phase of these jumps are
stable enough from year-to-year to emerge as “Climatological Intraseasonal
Oscillations” (Nakazawa, 1992; Ueda et al., 1995; Wang and Xu, 1997). The extreme phases of the phase-locked
intraseasonal oscillation are referred to as “singularities” in monsoon
climatology (Wang and Xu 1997).
Generally, regional convection centers vary in intensity on several time
scales, but it is not clear what controls their preferred location or
intensity. Webster et al. (1998)
proposed that individual centers can reinforce or compete with each other, for
example, subsidence associated with one convection center may suppress
convection in a neighboring location.
1.2 Questions: A number of related questions need to be
addressed in the study of the monsoon annual cycle. They include:
·
What
controls the migration of the large-scale convective heat source from the
equatorial western Indian Ocean across Bay of Bengal toward Indian subcontinent
during the monsoon onset? How does this
progression differ between weak and strong monsoons?
·
Why
is the Asian monsoon characterized by sudden changes (singularities) at
specific geographic locations?
·
What
are the radiative impacts of clouds, especially cirrus, on monsoon evolution
and intensity? Is cirrus coverage
during strong monsoons (strong flow aloft) significantly greater than during
weak monsoons?
·
How
does SST affect the monsoon annual cycle in various regions?
·
How
important are the East-Asian marginal seas in determining the mean monsoon
structure?
·
Does
the structure of convection, which depends on vertical wind shear and therefore
coupling with the ocean, vary significantly between weak and strong monsoons?
2. Intraseasonal variability:
2.1 Background: Dominant modes of monsoon variability during the wet season are
“break” and “active” periods with weak and heavy rainfall, respectively
(Krishnamurti and Bhalme, 1976; Murakami et al., 1986; Hendon and Liebmann,
1990a,b; Drosdowsky, 1996; Lau and Yang, 1996). These oscillations are closely linked to large-scale atmospheric
events that involve northward and/or eastward propagation of rain bands
(Yasunari, 1979, 1980; Krishnamurti et al., 1985). These events are commonly referred to as intraseasonal
oscillations (ISOs).
The ISOs strongly interact
with the monsoon. On the one hand, they
exhibit strong seasonality, and hence are regulated by the annual cycle
(Madden, 1986; Wang and Rui, 1990a).
During boreal winter, the eastward-propagating Madden-Julian (1971,
1972) equatorial mode dominates ISOs.
During boreal summer, however, ISO variability is much more complex,
appearing to involve the coexistence of several distinct modes: the
aforementioned eastward-propagating equatorial mode; a northward-propagating
signal primarily in the Indian monsoon region; a westward-propagating
off-equatorial mode in the western Pacific and southeast Asia; and a standing
oscillation between the equatorial Indian Ocean and western Pacific (Wang and
Rui, 1990a; Zhu and Wang, 1993). On the
other hand, ISOs also feedback to influence the monsoon on a variety of time
scales, including the annual cycle (Murakami et al., 1986). For example, there is an increasing amount
of evidence suggesting that ISOs are involved in interannual monsoon variations
(Webster, 1998). In the ECMWF model,
the dominant EOF pattern of interannual variability is strikingly similar to
that for the intraseasonal variability (Ferranti et al., 1997), suggesting that
they may be dynamically related. The
solution also indicated that year-to-year variations of the intensity and
frequency of ISOs contributed to interannual variations of monsoon rainfall. Such multiple-time scale interactions seem
to be a basic characteristic of the A-AMS, but the nature of the processes that
cause them is not well understood.
2.2 Hypotheses: Various hypotheses have been put forward to account for ISOs of A-AMS.
2.2.1 Local processes: Webster et al. (1983) emphasized the role of the
land-surface hydrological cycle in sustaining the northward propagation of the
rain bands, but northward propagation also takes place over the ocean.
2.2.2 Tropical-midlatitude interactions: Tropical-midlatitude
atmospheric events (such as cold surges) have been linked to ISOs, suggesting
they are involved in their generation (Sumathipala and Murakami, 1987; Magana
and Yanai, 1991; Meehl et al., 1996).
2.2.3 Ocean-atmosphere interactions: Active ocean-atmosphere coupling on
intraseasonal time scales was evident in the TOGA/COARE data (Flatau and
Flatau, 1997). The subsequent
theoretical analysis of Wang and Xie (1998) and numerical experiments of
Waliser et al. (1999) showed that this coupling can enhance ISOs. In addition, the cross-equatorial Ekman transport
in the Indian Ocean was shown to oscillate in-phase with the active-break
monsoon cycles of the monsoon, suggesting that the monsoon ISO may control
upper-ocean heat-content variations at intraseasonal time scales (Loschnigg and
Webster, 1996).
2.3 Questions: Fundamental questions that need to be
addressed in ISO studies include:
·
How
are the ISOs related to monsoon onset and withdrawal?
·
Why
does the equatorial Indian Ocean appear to be a source region for boreal summer
ISOs?
·
Why
do summertime ISOs propagate northward in the Indian Ocean while northwestward
over the western North Pacific?
·
How
do synoptic disturbances interact with ISOs?
·
Are
ISOs externally forced by tropical-extratropical interactions, or are they an
intrinsic mode of the tropical atmosphere?
·
What
are the linkages between ISOs and monsoon interannual variability?
3. Strategy: To address the questions
raised in this subsection, a strategy of combining diagnostic and modeling
studies is adopted. Many of the
fundamental features of the boreal summer ISOs and its relation to monsoon
annual cycle have been ambiguously defined.
This calls for a thorough observational analysis. The observational analysis will focus on
revealing fundamental characteristics of the boreal summer ISOs and their
relation to monsoon subseasonal variability.
The NCEP/NCAR and ECWMF reanalysis datasets, the CPC merged analysis of
precipitation and other measures of rainfall, and the NCEP SST, will be our
primary data sources. Results obtained
from these analyses will provide clues for the development of simplified
monsoon models and for the validation of existing model control runs. The observational analyses will also
facilitate formulation of hypotheses for theoretical study and the design of
future numerical experiments.
On the other hand, the
nonlinear nature of the A-AMS and its interaction with lower boundary forcing
limits the capability of empirical approaches in revealing the cause-effect
mechanisms of the complex interaction.
Therefore, it is necessary to use numerical models. The modeling effort will focus on increasing
our understanding of the physical processes responsible for both the
atmospheric internal dynamics and the roles of the lower boundary forcing. The primary models suitable for addressing
the problems raised in this subsection are intermediate atmospheric and oceanic
models (Wang and Fang, 1996) and atmospheric general circulation and
high-resolution regional monsoon models.
To identify the variability associated atmospheric internal dynamics,
the intermediate atmospheric models and atmospheric GCMs will be run in
uncoupled mode with prescribed lower boundary conditions; solutions will be
compared for various boundary forcings, to identify roles of SST or land
surface forcing in various regions. To
understand better specific mechanisms that may at work in a particular
phenomenon, simplified theoretical models will also be developed. These simplified models include anomaly
models that are suitable for study monsoon dynamics, and two-dimensional
coupled models that are suitable for elaborate the northward propagation of the
ISO in the monsoon domain.
1. Tropospheric Biennial
Oscillation:
1.1 Background: The Tropospheric Biennial Oscillation (TBO) is one of the most
pronounced components of Asia-Pacific climate.
1.1.1 Large-scale coherence: It is apparent in rainfall records in India (Mooley
and Parthasarathy, 1984), Indonesia (Yasunari and Suppiah, 1988), and East Asia
(Chen et al., 1992), appearing as prominent spectral peaks with periods ranging
from 2.2 to 3 years. Moreover, rainfall
is coherent over large spatial scales in the TBO frequency band, as shown by
analyses of global precipitation (Lau and Sheu, 1988). Anomalies of SST and surface winds in the
tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans also exhibit coherent variations at TBO time
scales (Barnett, 1991; Rasmusson et al., 1990; Ropelewski et al., 1992), but
with centers of maximum variability located near the equator not in the summer
monsoon regions.
1.1.2 Propagation: The TBO rainfall anomalies have been shown to originate in the South
Asia summer monsoon region, and then to propagate southeastward to the western
South Pacific (Meehl, 1987).
Tropospheric wind and SST anomalies also propagate from the Indian Ocean
to the Pacific Ocean (Barnett, 1983), and consequently Indian summer rainfall
is best correlated with the central-eastern Pacific SST at the following winter
(Yasunari, 1990). These properties
suggest that the TBO is an intrinsic mode of oscillation that is tightly
phase-locked to the annual cycle.
1.1.3 Relation to ENSO: Finally, the spatial structures of the TBO and of
ENSO are extremely similar. This
similarity leads to the speculation that the TBO is a component of ENSO in the
tropical Indo-Pacific Ocean.
1.2 Hypotheses: A number of hypotheses have been proposed for the cause of the
TBO. Meehl (1997) proposed that it is
an intrinsic oscillation of the coupled atmosphere-ocean-land system. His hypothesis not only involves local
ocean-atmosphere interactions, but also emphasizes the key roles of
land-surface feedback and tropical-midlatitude interactions (Meehl, 1994). Tomita and Yasunari (1998) hypothesized that
SST anomalies in the South China Sea and the winter monsoon maintained the TBO
via tropical-extratropical interactions.
A number of authors have proposed that the TBO arises through
interactions between the monsoon annual cycle and slowly evolving coupled
physics of the tropical ocean-atmosphere-land system (Nicholls, 1978; Barnett,
1991; Clarke et al., 1997; Chang and Li, 1999; Li and Chang, 1999). In their coupled ocean-atmosphere model Wang
et al. (1999) reported that stochastic forcing associated with the ISOs
enhanced interactions between the annual cycle and ENSO, resulting in
quasi-biennial oscillations.
1.3 Questions: Key questions for understanding the nature
and dynamics of the TBO are:
·
What
are essential characteristics of the TBO in terms of its coherent spatial
structure and temporal evolution?
·
What
sets the time scale of the oscillation (2.3-3 years), and why is it irregular?
·
What
determines its amplitude modulation on decadal time scales?
·
Is
the TBO simply the quasi-biennial component of ENSO, or an independent mode of
oscillation?
·
What
is the influence of the monsoon annual cycle?
·
How
does tropical-extratropical interactions contribute to the generation and
maintenance of the TBO?
·
Do
TBO dynamics involve remote forcing from either the eastern central Pacific or
the extratropical land surface?
2. Interannual monsoon variability:
2.1 Background: The development of some anomalous states of the Indian monsoon is
clearly associated with ENSO (e.g., Shukla and Palino, 1983; Shukla,
1987). On the other hand, other
anomalous monsoons appear to have nothing to do with ENSO, suggesting that
there are intrinsic modes of interannual climate variability within the
A-AMS. Moreover, there is now evidence
indicating that the Asian monsoon may in turn influence ENSO and other
seasonal-to-interannual climate signals (Yasunari, 1990; Webster and Yang,
1992; Mantua and Battisti, 1995; Wainer and Webster, 1996; Lau and Yang, 1996).
2.1 Hypotheses:
2.1.1 Tropical interactions: Monsoon-ENSO interactions may be realized through
changes in the location or intensity of convective heat sources within the
tropics. The large-scale monsoon heat
source migrates northwest-southeast across the equator following the land
distribution (Meehl, 1987), whereas the one associated with ENSO migrates
east-west along the equator with the shift of the warm pool during warm and
cold events (Webster and Lukas, 1992).
The interaction of these two convective systems is believed to be partly
responsible for the complexity of interannual variability in the A-AMS region.
2.1.2 Extratropical interactions: The evolution of monsoon circulation in the
western North Pacific and South China Sea may also play an important role in
linking the Asian monsoon and ENSO.
Yasunari (1990) showed a connection between Indian monsoon rainfall and
variation of the subsurface water temperature in the western North
Pacific. Wind-stress variability over
the western North Pacific has important impacts on the Pacific basin-wide
thermocline adjustment and ENSO evolution (Wang et al., 1999). The western Pacific monsoon has received
little attention in the past.
Understanding the interannual variation of the monsoon in this area, and
its relationships to the other regional Asian monsoons, is an urgent need.
2.3 Questions: Questions that need to be addressed are:
·
What
are the dominant modes of A-AMS interannual variability, and what processes
generate them?
·
Are
remote influences from the Pacific and Indian Oceans important for these
variations? If so, which oceanic
regions are most closely linked with monsoon variability in a particular
subregion?
·
How
important are SST variations in the western Pacific and Asian marginal seas in
the interannual variations of the East Asian summer monsoon?
·
Why
do Pacific SST anomalies affect the Indian summer monsoon in some years but not
in others? One possibility is that
Indian Ocean SST anomalies are also effective in influencing the Indian
monsoon. What processes determine
interannual SST variability in the Indian Ocean?
·
What
are the dominant modes of monsoon-ENSO coupling? It is known that ENSO affects the monsoon. To what extent and how do monsoon variations
in turn impact the Pacific trades and ENSO?
3. Interdecadal monsoon variability:
3.1 Background:
3.1.1 Climate shift in the 1970s: The North Pacific climate shift in the late
1970s (Nitta and Yamada, 1989; Trenberth and Hurrell, 1994) significantly
changed the onset characteristics of the Pacific basin-wide warming (Wang,
1995). There is now evidence that its
impacts are also reflected in the A-AMS.
Nitta and Hu (1996) showed a sudden change in summer rainfall and
temperature over the southern China (22-26oN, 110-120oE) that occurred nearly
in phase with the North-Pacific climate shift.
Furthermore, the position of the ridge of the western North Pacific
Subtropical High exhibited a coherent change: The North-Pacific cooling after
the late 1970s was accompanied by a southwestward extension of the subtropical
ridge and by drought and hot summer conditions in southern China. Australian temperatures also exhibited
prominent change after the late 1970s.
3.1.2 Decadal monsoon-ENSO interactions: There are also indications
that the monsoon and ENSO interact at decadal time scales. Torrence and Webster (1998) conducted a
wavelet analysis of monsoon and ENSO variability during the 20th century,
finding considerable decadal fluctuations in the variance of both
phenomena. Kripalani and Kulkarni
(1996) showed that extrema of Indian-monsoon rainfall tended to occur when ENSO
and decadal variations were in phase, with El Niño events tending to result in
floods during above-normal decadal epochs.
The mechanisms that might account for this decadal monsoon-ENSO
connection are not known. In a modeling
study, Meehl et al. (1998) note a close correspondence between decadal
variations of tropical Pacific SSTs, the South Asian monsoon, and global
decadal climate variability.
3.2 Questions: Our knowledge of the nature of A-AMS interdecadal variability is
extremely limited, and it needs to be documented systematically. Fundamental questions like the following
need to be addressed:
·
What
is the relationship between the interdecadal variation of the A-AMS monsoon and
the interdecadal variation of global SST?
·
To
what extent and how does interdecadal shift of Pacific Ocean climate affect the
Asian summer monsoon? In general, how
does Indo-Pacific decadal variability affect the A-AMS?
·
Does
the winter monsoon in turn affect Pacific decadal variability, as suggested by
Namias et al. (1988)? Specifically,
What role does A-AMS winter variability (particularly, regarding the Siberian
High and the Aleutian Low) play in Pacific decadal SST variability?
·
How
are ISOs, and the onset of ENSO, modulated by Pacific decadal variability?
4. Synoptic and climate variability of tropical storms in the A-AM
region
4.1 Background: The western North Pacific (WNP) is one of the most important regions
for the tropical cyclone (TC) genesis in the world, with about 40% of all TCs
being generated in the region each year (Gray, 1968). Observations show that more than 80% of TCs in the WNP form in
the ITCZ/monsoon trough, where both the large-scale confluent flow and cumulus
convection are favorable for the formation of synoptic-scale disturbances and
TCs (Gray, 1968). Ritchie and Holland
(1998) summarized 5 environmental flow regimes associated with the TC genesis
in the WNP: the monsoon shear line, monsoon confluence region, easterly waves,
Rossby-energy dispersion, and monsoon gyre: Over an 8-year analysis period,
percentages of the TC genesis associated with each regime were 42%, 29%, 18%,
8%, and 3%, respectively. The monsoon
shear lines may provide dynamical instability to initiate the CISK and WISHE
mechanisms. The confluence zone between
easterly trades and monsoon westerlies has been shown to be important for a
range of scale interactions and energy accumulations by atmospheric internal
waves (e.g., Holland, 1995, Kuo et al., 2001).
The impact of ENSO on the
genesis and intensification of tropical cyclones in the western North Pacific
was investigated using observational data (Wang and Chan 2002). During an El Niño most tropical storms form
in the southeast quadrant (5-17ºN, 140-180ºE), whereas during a La Niña most
form in the northwest quadrant (17-30ºN, 120-140ºE). In addition, during strong El Niño years, 2.5 times more tropical
storms in the fall recurve northward across 35ºN than during strong La Niña
years. These properties imply that El
Niño events substantially increase the poleward transport of heat and moisture,
which may have a significant impact on the extratropical general circulation. The authors
hypothesized that the properties were attributable to changes in the
large-scale circulation associated with ENSO forcing, such as the zonal shift
of low-level vorticity associated with meridional shear of the zonal flow and
the change of strength of the midlatitude subtropical high.
4.2 Questions: Questions that need to be addressed are:
·
What
are the important dynamic and thermodynamic factors regulating the climate
variability of the TC genesis and movement in the A-AM region?
·
How
do climate changes of TC tracks impact the tropical-midlatitude heat and
moisture exchange and global energy budget?
·
What
are the synoptic atmospheric processes that lead to tropical cyclogenesis in
the WNP?
5. Strategy: Addressing these questions requires studies on the
interaction between ENSO, the Asian monsoon, and the interdecadal variations
through both diagnostic analysis and numerical experiments with a hierarchy of
numerical models. In principle, the strategy
for study of the interannual to interdecadal variability of the A-AMS is
similar to that previously proposed for study of the monsoon annual cycle and
ISOs. Models that will be used include
conceptual and intermediate systems, atmospheric GCMs and high-resolution
regional monsoon models, and coupled GCMs.
The AGCM and regional monsoon climate models, and their coupled
versions, will be discussed in more detail in the next subsections. In addition to numerical modeling, data
analysis with modern satellite products (e.g., TRMM and QuikSCAT data) will be
conducted to identify the processes that give rise to cyclogenesis in the A-AM
region
1. Atmosphere-ocean-land
interactions:
1.1 Background: The A-AMS is arguably the
best example of tight coupling of ocean-atmosphere-land processes (Webster,
1987). Seasonal land heating and ocean
heating alone are not able to account for the observed monsoons, both being
needed (Shukla and Fennessy, 1994; Li and Yanai, 1996).
1.1.1 Orographic effects: The response of the tropics to the annual cycle of
solar forcing is strongly influenced by the distribution of land, with
pronounced zonal variability in both the annual cycle and the mean state. Orographic effects are important in
determining diabatic heating over the Tibetan Plateau (Murakami, 1987; He et
al., 1987; Ding, 1994; Li and Yanai, 1996), and are likely important to the
atmospheric circulation and the diabatic heating over the maritime continent
(Kitoh and Yamazaki, 1991). Land-locked
convection in the Australasian sector is associated with intense diabatic
heating, which drives large-scale atmospheric circulations, such as the Walker
Circulation (Cornejo-Garrido and Stone, 1977; Stone and Chervin, 1984), and the
monsoons (Webster, 1987).
1.1.2 Oceanic effects: The associated surface winds extract moisture from
the ocean by evaporation, drive ocean currents that redistribute heat, and stir
the upper ocean resulting in diabatic cooling.
These upper-ocean processes appear to be important in both the
western-Pacific warm pool and the northern Indian Ocean (Yasunari, 1989; Lukas
and Lindstrom, 1991; Meehl, 1993). The
resulting SST variations can feedback to affect winds and rain, both positively
and negatively. These feedback
processes are an important aspect of the tropical climate, and they are
critical to the existence of interannual modes of variability (Hirst and Lau,
1990; Wang and Xie, 1998). In the
tropical Pacific, ocean-atmosphere processes are also essential for the
development of prominent features of the annual cycle as well (Mitchell and
Wallace, 1992; Wang, 1994; Xie and Philander, 1994; Philander et al., 1996).
1.2 Questions: Questions like the following need to be addressed:
·
Are
there coupled ocean-atmosphere-land modes of interannual-to-interdecadal
variability intrinsic to the A-AMS?
·
How
do ocean-atmosphere and land-atmosphere interactions contribute to the
generation and maintenance of the TBO and variability of the ENSO-monsoon
system?
·
What
roles do atmosphere-ocean interactions play in generating and maintaining ISOs?
·
How
does topography (e.g., the Tibetan Plateau) influence the onset and decay of
the mean monsoon?
·
Is
ocean-atmosphere interaction actively involved in the monsoon annual cycle?
·
What
roles does the atmosphere-ocean-land interaction play in the annual march of
the convection centers and the formation of the Asian monsoon singularities?
2. Monsoon predictability:
2.1 Background: Predictability of the A-AMS
has been an important research area for many years (e.g., Walker, 1923;
Normand, 1953; Charney and Shukla, 1981; WCRP, 1993). It is a particularly difficult problem because the monsoons
involve interactions on such a wide range of time scales. It is nevertheless believed that some
aspects of A-AMS variability are predictable.
This predictability arises due both to regional processes that
contribute to low-frequency boundary forcing and to global influences that
modulate the smallest space and time scales (hydrological processes).
2.1.1 ENSO interactions: Webster and Yang (1992) and Lau and Yang (1996)
discuss monsoon/ENSO interaction as a means for enhancing monsoon
predictability. Webster and Yang (1992)
hypothesized that the seasonal variation of the SST gradient along the equator
in the Pacific Ocean is the primary factor in variations of the coupling
between the Pacific basin and the A-AMS, whereas Ju and Slingo (1995) noted
that variations in the ITCZ provided a mechanism for linking the two regions.
2.1.2 Other interannual interactions: Other interannual modes of the coupled
system seem to exist, and they offer hope of additional predictive skill beyond
what might be gained from ENSO prediction alone. For example, the correlation pattern between SST and Australian
winter monsoon rainfall shows a dipole, with a maximum centered near New
Guinea, a minimum in the tropical southern Indian Ocean, and a node stretching
from Southeast Asia through Indonesia to northwest Australia (Nicholls, 1989). A third center of action is found under the
South Pacific Convergence Zone.
Enhanced rain is associated with warmer SST north and east of Australia.
2.1.3 ISO interactions: On the other hand, it must be recognized that
monsoon interannual variability may be intrinsically linked to higher-frequency
monsoon variations, such as the ISOs.
Thus, monsoon predictability may be limited by its own internal dynamics
(Palmer et al., 1992; Palmer, 1993; Brancovic et al., 1994).
2.2 Questions: Questions that need be considered in this topic include:
·
Are
the monsoon intraseasonal oscillations chaotic? Or to what extent they are predictable?
·
To
what extent the monsoon predictability is prohibited by the chaotic atmospheric
internal dynamics?
·
Are
there geographic differences in the monsoon predictability? And why if any?
·
What
factors determine the predictability of the A-AMS?
3. Strategy: Addressing the questions
raised in this subsection requires exclusively the use of coupled
atmosphere-ocean-land models.
3.1 Model development: Our working hypothesis is that there are
seasonal-to-interannual A-AMS variations that are partially predictable due to
slowly varying regional boundary conditions and remotely forced signals. It is therefore essential to be able to
model the monsoon system realistically.
Yet, existing climate models have difficulty in producing realistic
simulations of monsoon rainfall, especially in East Asia, and they cannot
accurately simulate ISOs. Moreover, the
present coupled AGCMs are not able to determine either the sensitivity of the
monsoon to SST anomalies or the processes that cause the anomalies. A key IPRC research effort, then, is to
develop coupled GCMs, and nested regional climate models, that are able to
simulate accurately the mean monsoon, ISOs, and interannual monsoon variability
(see Section VD). This development will
be a difficult task, given the well-known sensitivity of coupled system to the
background climate state (e.g., Battisti and Hirst, 1989; Davey et al., 1996),
initial conditions (e.g., Palmer et al., 1992), and ensemble averaging (e.g.,
Stern and Miyakoda, 1995).
3.2 Model intercomparison: In addition to model development, the IPRC will
make use of model intercomparison projects, such as AMIP, ENSIP and CMIP. These projects bring together different
models that have been initialized from the same point and integrated for a
common period. (In the case of the
uncoupled AMIP, all models were forced with the same SST boundary conditions.) Comparison of the monsoon circulation among
the members of these model ensembles can be very revealing not only of model
deficiencies, but also of model strengths (Sperber and Palmer, 1996).
3.3 Systematic approach: The model will then be used in a systematic
numerical experimentation program, designed to quantify the relative roles of
atmosphere-ocean and atmosphere-land interactions in A-AMS climate
variability. First, the global GCM will
be integrated with climatological SST and land conditions. Then, additional integrations will be obtained
in which land processes and/or SST are allowed to vary. Intercomparison of the various integrations
will provide a quantitative basis for estimating the relative importance of
internal dynamics, atmosphere-land interactions, and atmosphere-ocean interaction. Identification of the roles of an individual
interaction process in mean monsoon and monsoon variability can be achieved by
adequately designed numerical experiments with coupled GCMs or hybrid coupled
GCM (regional monsoon model) with an intermediate ocean model. In many cases of monsoon studies, our
concern is confined to the feedback of slowly evolving SST rather than
deep-ocean circulation. Use of hybrid
coupled model can be more efficient provided the intermediate ocean model well
simulates SST variations.
3.4 Hindcast-mode predictability studies: One of the approaches that
is useful for determining monsoon predictability is to perform ensemble
hindcasts. Obviously, the hindcast-mode
predictability studies will be compared with historical observations. Forecast-mode predictability studies can
benefit from the abundance of satellite observations that are now becoming
available. For example, we will have
the opportunity to compare model predictions in the future with observations of
oceanic rainfall from TRMM.
1. Background: Essential factors in A-AMS
dynamics are continental-scale land-surface hydrological processes. Latent heat release through moisture convergence
is a critical process providing positive feedback to the monsoon
circulation. In addition to its obvious
involvement in diabatic heating, the hydrologic cycle also plays an important
role in terms of soil moisture processes (Webster, 1983, 1987), snow cover
(Hahn and Shukla, 1976; Barnett et al., 1989; Yanai and Li, 1994), and
vegetation. Studies of the large-scale
land-atmosphere interaction and hydro-meteorological processes are particularly
relevant to A-AMS studies.
2. Questions: The objectives of the IPRC
research effort in this area are to understand the hydrological cycle in the
atmosphere, at the land surface, and in the upper oceans, and to determine its
impacts on the A-AMS. Questions that
need to be addressed are:
·
What
roles do land-atmosphere and ocean-atmosphere interactions have in determining
the A-AMS hydrological cycle?
·
What
roles does the hydrological cycle play in the monsoon active and break periods?
·
Does
the land surface play an active role in monsoon hydrological variations on intraseasonal
to interdecadal variations?
·
Does
the ocean play an active role?
3. Strategy:
3.1 Nested system: To address such questions, an essential part of IPRC strategy is to
use high-resolution models of the A-AMS region that incorporate hydrology. It will be necessary to imbed the regional
models within global GCMs that can produce realistic simulations of the
atmospheric general circulation, including the planetary-scale signals known to
influence the A-AMS. The circulation
from this “external” model will then provide lateral boundary conditions or
background conditions to drive a high-resolution regional model. If desirable, the regional model may in turn
be used to force yet more highly resolved hydrological models. Several preliminary modeling studies have
indicated the potential of such a nested modeling approach for improving
regional climate forecasts. For
example, NCEP’s ETA model has been successfully nested within the COLA AGCM,
and the resulting solutions compared better with Asian summer monsoon rainfall
observations (Vernekar et al., 1995).
3.2 Choice and development of nested system: The IPRC will not attempt
to build its own AGCM or regional system from ground up, but seek to utilize
previously developed ones (such as ETA).
It is anticipated that this choice will not be easy, given the
phenomenological complexity of the A-AMS, and several candidate models will be
evaluated initially.
3.3 Systematic approach: The regional model will be used in a systematic
numerical experimentation program, designed to quantify the relative roles of
atmosphere-ocean and atmosphere-land interactions in the variability of the
A-AMS and associated hydrological cycle.
The principles of the approach is simile to that discussed in section C.
3.4 Other activities: Finally, this objective will also be pursued
through data analysis, and will be closely associated with observational
efforts such as GAME (GEWEX Asian Monsoon Experiment) and SCSMEX (South China
Sea Monsoon Experiment).
It is recognized that
changes in external forcing can profoundly influence the earth's climate system
and have significant effects in the Asia-Pacific region. These forcings can include greenhouse gases,
anthropogenic aerosols, solar variability, soot, mineral dust, and volcanic
aerosols. Prominent among these, and of
first priority for the IPRC to address, are possible changes from increasing
greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols.
Each has a significantly different effect on radiative forcing over the
Asian region. Greenhouse-gas increases
provide positive radiative forcing to the climate system with no particular
regional pattern. Sulfate aerosols, on
the other hand, provide a strongly regional negative radiative forcing over and
around South Asia (Mitchell et al., 1995).
The way these two forcings
combine has dramatic implications for the South Asian monsoon. Global coupled GCMs run with CO2 increase
and no change in aerosols generally show an increase in the strength of the
South Asian monsoon (e.g., Meehl and Washington, 1993). This is because the Asian land mass heats
faster than the ocean in these experiments and the resulting increased land-sea
temperature gradient then drives a more intense monsoon circulation. With the addition of the regional negative
radiative forcing from sulfate aerosols, however, usually there is a decrease
in monsoon intensity (e.g., Meehl et al., 1996; Lal et al., 1995; Mitchell and
Johns, 1997). This is because the
negative forcing from the sulfate aerosols locally dominates the positive
forcing from the increased greenhouse gases; consequently, the Asian land area
does not warm as fast as the Indian Ocean, the land-sea temperature gradient
decreases, and the monsoon weakens.
This opposite-sign outcome
for the South Asian monsoon (depending on how future aerosol concentrations are
included in the models) is one of the most glaring and outstanding
uncertainties for the future climate of South Asia. The IPRC will address several questions aimed at reducing
uncertainty in this key area. First,
the nature and radiative characteristics of the anthropogenic aerosols
currently being produced needs to be determined. An essential first step in that direction is the recent
collection of aerosol data and radiation properties by INDOEX (1999). The IPRC will rely on this crucial dataset
and associated analyses for improved estimates of the radiative effects of
sulfate aerosols in the Asian region.
Preliminary results show that aerosols produced over South Asia are
“darker” than anthropogenic aerosols over North America or western Europe. This darkening is thought to be the result
of less “scrubbing” of emissions over South Asia. A darker aerosol over Asia will have profound effects on the
magnitude of the negative radiative forcing thought to be associated with
anthropogenic sulfate aerosols. Another
uncertainty is how to account for the direct (clear sky) vs. indirect (enhanced
cloud reflectivity) effects of sulfate aerosols (Iwasaki and Kitagawa,
1997). The IPRC scientists will make
use of current data (e.g., from INDOEX, the US Atmospheric Radiation
Measurement (ARM) program, or the 3rd Aerosol Characterization Experiment
(ACE-3) southeast of Japan) to test various parameterizations of aerosol
effects in GCM integrations and to look specifically at the details of the
response over South Asia. Second,
future projections of emissions and aerosol concentrations over Asia need to be
refined. The four recent scenarios for
future emissions formulated by IPCC (1999) are a step in that direction. These latest scenarios can be included in
model simulations performed by IPRC staff in both global models and embedded
regional models over South Asia.
Another aspect of
uncertainty concerning the South Asian monsoon is that some global coupled
models show an increase of interannual variability of the South Asian monsoon
with increased CO2 (Meehl and Washington, 1993; Kitoh et al, 1997; Bhaskharan and Mitchell,
1998). This effect is of interest
because of the possibility of increased extremes of drought and flood in future
monsoon seasons. A focus for IPRC
scientists therefore will be not only to investigate changes in the mean
monsoon climate due to increasing greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols, but
also changes in its variability. For
this purpose, IPRC scientists will perform on-site modeling experiments with
global or embedded regional models, and can analyze model output from various
international centers archived by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
(CMIP) or the IPCC Data Distribution Centre (DDC).
El Niño is associated with
some of the most pronounced climatic variability in the Asia-Pacific
region. In connection with future
climate warming, several aspects of El Niño need to be assessed that could
affect future climate extremes: Will
the long-term mean Pacific climate shift toward a more El Niño-like or La
Nina-like regime? Will El Niño
variability (the amplitude and/or the frequency of temperature swings in
equatorial Pacific) increase or decrease?
How will El Niño’s impact on weather in the Pacific basin and Asia
change?
Several global climate
models indicate that as global temperatures warm due to increased greenhouse
gases, the Pacific climate will tend to resemble an El Niño-like state more
(Meehl and Washington 1996, Knutson and Manabe, 1998; Mitchell et al., 1995;
Timmermann et al., 1999). That is, in
the mean the eastern Pacific would warm relatively more than the west, with an associated
eastward shift of precipitation from Australasia to the central and western
Pacific. This conclusion could be
sensitive to model representations of cloud feedbacks (Meehl et al., 1999), and
indeed some models show a La-Nina-like response (Noda et al., 1999).
So far, attempts to address
the question of future changes in El Niño variability using climate models have
shown conflicting results, varying from slight decreases or little amplitude
change (Tett, 1995; Knutson et al., 1997) to a substantial amplitude increase
(Timmermann, et al., 1999). Concerning
El Niño’s effects on Asia-Pacific weather, Meehl et al.'s (1993) results
indicate that future seasonal precipitation extremes associated with a given El
Niño are likely to be more intense due to the warmer mean base state in a
future climate. Specifically, for the
tropical Pacific and Indian Ocean regions, anomalously wet areas could become
wetter, and anomalously dry areas become drier during future El Niño
events. In addition, changes in the extratropical
base state in a future warmer climate may cause a shift in the teleconnection
pattern to midlatitudes, particularly over the North Pacific, which may result
in an associated shift of precipitation and drought conditions in future El
Niño events (Meehl et al., 1993).
When assessing changes in El
Niño, it must be recognized that an "El Niño-like" pattern can occur
at a variety of timescales ranging from interannual to interdecadal (Zhang et
al., 1997; Lau and Weng, 1999) or even
as a response to external forcings such as increased CO2 noted above (Meehl and
Washington, 1996; Knutson and Manabe 1998).
Making conclusions about “changes” in future El Niño events will be
complicated by these factors. Additionally,
since substantial internally generated variability of El Niño statistics occurs
on multi-decadal to century time scales occurs in long unforced climate model
simulations (Knutson et al., 1997), the attribution of past and future changes
in El Niño amplitude and frequency to external forcing may be quite difficult,
perhaps requiring use of ensemble climate experiments. Thus, IPRC scientists will make use of
climate change experiments with global coupled models from other centers made
available internationally as mentioned above, and run ensemble experiments with
coupled models at the IPRC specifically designed to study changes of El Niño,
the El Niño-like response pattern, and the associated affects on the A-AMS.
Land-cover and land-use
practices have changed dramatically over the past century and will continue to
change in Asia, with potentially important impacts on the region’s climate and
hydrology. For example, the development
of roads in northern Thailand has been shown to have significantly impacted the hydrology of the region
(Giambelluca, 1996). Deforestation
resulting from logging has been shown to alter local climatic (Giambelluca et
al., 1996; Zhang et al., 1996) and hydrologic (Ziegler and Giambelluca, 1996)
conditions, and vegetation changes over South Asia have been shown to directly
affect monsoon characteristics (Chase et al., 1996). Understanding these climate and hydrology impacts is a
prerequisite for making numerical predictions about other global and regional
climate changes given projections of future states of land cover.
This objective can only be
achieved in the framework of numerical models which successfully simulate the
monsoon system and its natural variability.
Such models must have sophisticated land-surface components. A hierarchy of climate models will be used
to address this objective, including atmosphere/land surface models run with
observed SSTs, global coupled GCMs, and embedded high-resolution regional
models with detailed hydrologic formulations.
Experiments will be conducted to determine the sensitivity of the
model’s climate statistics to specified changes from a control run. For example, land-surface characteristics
observed by Landsat and by AVER have changed in the 20+ years of
observation. Do discernible changes in
the observed characteristics correspond to significant changes in the model
simulations? Because the monsoon system
may include instabilities and therefore be chaotic, it will be necessary to
conduct ensemble integrations. In
addition to experiments with global atmosphere/land surface models with
observed SSTs and integrations with global coupled GCMs, control runs in the
global framework can be used to provide external boundary conditions to an
embedded high resolution regional model with more detailed hydrology to conduct
local impacts experiments.
The ultimate goal will be to
perform model experiments with an interactive land-surface model. That is, as the external forcing changes due
to increased greenhouse gases or sulfate aerosols, how does the surface
vegetation change and feed back onto the regional climate changes. In a similar way, specified land use changes
could be included to determine the feedbacks on the climate system, which would
then influence the conditions of the land surface. An embedded regional land-use and land-cover-change model could
be used for this purpose.
The IPRC will ensure that
adequate resources are available to pursue its mission. Above all, the IPRC’s success requires
participation of highly qualified scientists.
It also requires a foundation of stable financial support,
state-of-the-art computing facilities, easy access to climate data sets, and a sufficient infrastructure.
Joint research activities at
the IPRC are conducted as a part of the Frontier Research System for Global
Change (FRSGC) on the Japanese side, and as a part of the Global Change
Research Program of the United States on the US side. Its annual budget is submitted to the Implementation Committee
(see Section VIIIB) for review and approval.
The IPRC is currently funded by the FRSGC through JAMSTEC and NASDA and
by NASA on the US side. Additional
support from the US participating parties (NSF, NASA, NOAA, DOE) is expected.
To maintain a viable
research program that can attain IPRC objectives requires a team of stably
funded, resident researchers with expertise in a variety of fields (e.g.,
numerical experimentation, oceanic and atmospheric GCM development, and data
and model analysis). Several types of
scientists make up the IPRC research staff: tenure-track faculty,
non-tenure-track research scientists, Frontier researchers, post-docs, and
students.
1. Tenure-track faculty: As permanent members of the
UH faculty, these scientists provide the backbone of the IPRC research
staff. The Interim Cooperative
Agreement between UH and JAMSTEC/NASDA calls for up to 10 tenure-track UH
faculty, funded jointly by UH and JAMSTEC/NASDA. To date, 5 of these positions have been filled.
2. Research scientists: These non-permanent
positions are renewed annually, but with no upper limit for the duration of
employment. Currently, 10 of these
positions are filled for 2001, funded both by FRSGC and NASA through the
Research Corporation of the University of Hawaii (RCUH). Three more research scientists will be hired
during 2001 using NASA funds.
3. Frontier researchers: These scientists are
employees of JAMSTEC through the FRSGC, and at UH have the status of
“non-compensated visiting colleagues.”
As the “visits” of these scientists are multi-year, they are an
important (essential) part of the IPRC research program. Currently, there are 3 such scientists at
the IPRC.
4. Post-doctoral fellows and
students:
Currently, the IPRC supports 6 post-doctoral fellows. Four of them will leave during 2001, and will be replaced by 5
new postdocs. The IPRC also supports
several graduate students, who came to the IPRC together with new IPRC faculty. Funds for postdocs are currently all from
the IPRC FRSGC or NASA grants. Future
support is also expected to arise from individually funded proposals.
Much of the IPRC modeling
activities require the use of state-of-the-art oceanic and atmospheric
GCMs. These models can only be run on
extremely fast computers with large internal memories. They also require substantial mass storage,
a technical support staff, supportive workstations, and a high-speed local
network. The IPRC computing facilities
must be capable of routinely carrying out long integrations of models of
intermediate complexity, as well as shorter integrations using highly resolved,
state-of-the-art GCMs. Production runs
using the latter models will likely remain beyond IPRC capability, and require
computational resources at national or international supercomputer centers.
Computational resource needs
are expected to change often. To ensure
that the IPRC responds to these changing needs, the computing facilities will
be reviewed periodically, but at least once each year.
1. Central system: The IPRC central computing
system requires one or more compute servers, a file server, and nearly on-line
storage capability. It must be able to
service all IPRC researchers (eventually as many as 10 tenure-track faculty and
30 or more other scientists), and allow access by a suitable level of
collaborating scientists at other institutions. Finally, it must be "balanced" in that the components
have comparable levels of capability, so that no single one of them represents
a serious bottleneck.
The central components
currently at the IPRC are:
Compute
Servers: The
IPRC has five compute servers: i) a
shared-memory, vector-parallel system Cray SV-1 with 24 CPUs, 14 GB RAM, a 152
GB disk, and a peak speed of 28.8 GFLOPS, ii)
an SGI Origin 2000 with 32 CPU system with 18 GB RAM, a 198 GB disk system, and
a peak speed of 16 GFLOPS; and iii)
an SGI Origin 2000 with 24 CPU system with 8.5 GB RAM, 27 GB disk, and 11
GFLOPS peak speed, iv); a Sun
Enterprise 450 with 4 CPU’s and 2 GB memory and a peak speed of 3.2 GFLOPS and,
v) an Aspen Systems 2 CPU Alpha based
system with a peak speed of 3 GFLOPS. A
sixth compute server, an Origin 3400 with 24 CPU’ and a peak speed of 19.2
GFLOPS should be online in the near future.
With these machines, the IPRC has local access to both shared-memory,
distributed-memory systems, and vector machines. This availability enables IPRC researchers to develop code for
all modern computer architectures.
File Server: The file server is a
cluster of computers or processing elements that are well equipped with memory,
disk capacity and input/output bandwidth for post-integration analysis and
visualization of solutions obtained on the compute servers. The current IPRC file server is a 4 CPU SGI
Origin 200 with 1 GB RAM and a peak speed of 1.4 GFLOPS. The server controls magnetic disks (1028 GB,
RAID 5) and a data storage library. In
the near future, a switched Fibre Channel storage area network will allow
direct 100 MB/s access to the RAID storage from all of the SGI servers.
Data Storage: The concept of nearly
online data storage is that of a large-capacity data repository that allows
data to be stored and retrieved easily without human intervention. The IPRC system is a StorageTek 9710
automatic tape library with 6 tape drives.
Capacity is 14.7 TB, and the software includes automatic file migration
from the compute servers and backup of files.
These resources should meet
IPRC needs for the next few years.
2. Technical support: The current staff consists
of a systems manager, a scientific programmer, and a data specialist. Requested positions for additional
programmers, a second data specialist and a second system administrator will be
filled soon.
3. Workstations: Each researcher has a
workstation and/or a personal computer (PC) available for visualization, data
analysis, communication and word processing.
Currently, the IPRC has 31 workstations and 49 personal computers.
4. Networking: The various units within the
IPRC computing facility must be networked at a bandwidth high enough to provide
a level of connectivity consistent with the rate at which the compute servers
can output results. The computing
facility itself must have a relatively high bandwidth connectivity to provide
adequate remote access. The existing
network meets these requirements.
All IPRC research activities
require extensive use of climate data.
The IPRC Asia-Pacific Climate Data Center (APDRC) is envisioned to
assist scientists in this regard. Its
Mission Statement is:
The Mission of
the Asia Pacific Data Research Center is to increase understanding of climate
variability in the Asia-Pacific region by developing the computational,
data-management, and networking infrastructure necessary to make data resources
readily accessible and usable by researchers, and by undertaking data-intensive
research activities that will both advance knowledge and lead to improvements
in data collection and preparation.
The linkage of research
activities with data management in one center is novel, and we expect the
combination to lead to increased data usage, to improvements in data products,
and hence to more rapid scientific progress.
To achieve its Mission,
specific APDRC goals are to: 1)
develop and implement a user-friendly data server system (DSS); 2) establish efficient DSS communication
in an international setting; 3)
maintain a data archive focussed on Asia-Pacific issues; and 4) undertake data-intensive research
projects that will both advance scientific knowledge and lead to improvements
in data collection and preparation.
Data-management tasks to be undertaken at the APDRC include collection,
quality control, synthesis, and interpolation onto useful grids. Research activities include both data
analysis and data assimilation. Data
assimilation is a particularly important activity for the APDRC, and a close
working relationship with the Global Ocean data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE)
project will be sought.
It is hoped and expected
that the APDRC will develop into a powerful research resource, not just for
IPRC scientists, but for the international climate community as well. In addition to the obvious scientific
benefits of such an international resource, the collection and distribution of
data between the IPRC and other countries in the Asia-Pacific region (and
elsewhere) will provide a means for strengthening international collaboration.
The APDRC does not yet exist
owing to insufficient funds from the FRSGC grant. Funds from the NASA grant will support much of the APDRC’s
research part. Funds for its
data-management part are being sought from NOAA.
Everyday IPRC activities
require adequate space and administrative support. Space requirements include:
·
Offices
·
Computing
center
·
Data
Center
·
Library
·
Conference
room(s)
·
Seminar/lecture
room(s)
Administrative requirements
include personnel to assist with:
·
Visa
acquisition
·
Conference/meeting/workshop
support
·
Visitor
program (visa requirements, travel, lodging, etc.)
·
Public
relations
·
Purchasing
and other fiscal matters
At the present time, the
IPRC physical plant and support personnel are adequate to meet these needs.
The purpose of the IPRC
management structure is to ensure that the Center develops into an
international focal point for Asia-Pacific climate research. The management structure includes mechanisms
both for internal review and for external guidance.
The internal management
structure is designed to ensure the active participation of all IPRC scientists
in decision making. Mechanisms to
ensure this participation include regular meetings with the entire research
staff, Research Teams with Team Leaders, a Steering Committee, and annual
review of the Science and Work Plans.
1. IPRC scientists: The IPRC researchers are an
information resource that should be tapped.
So, the research staff will be consulted on all substantive IPRC issues
before a decision is reached.
2. Research Teams: The IPRC Themes, Goals, and
Objectives outline an extensive and varied research agenda. To facilitate progress, IPRC activities are
divided into a number of smaller Research Teams. Each Team will focus on one (or more) of the IPRC objectives or
activities. They will be led by Team
Leaders, who will usually be selected from the long-term scientific staff
(i.e., either from the tenure-track faculty or Frontier visiting
scientists). Team Leaders will annually
review the status of their Research Team.
3. Committees: The IPRC Steering Committee
consists of the IPRC Director, Executive Associate Director, Liaison Officer,
and Team Leaders. It meets
regularly to discuss all IPRC issues. The other IPRC Committees are charged with
providing advice to the IPRC Director concerning the maintenance and
improvement of specific IPRC activities.
Currently, these committees are the Data, Computer, Visitors, Meetings
and Workshops, Library, and Public Relations Committees. Membership on these committees is renewed
annually.
4. IPRC administrators: The IPRC administrators are
the Director, Executive Associate Director, and Liaison Officer. The Director has the overall responsibility
for all aspects of the IPRC. His(her)
duties are outlined in the Implementation Guide. Among other duties, the Executive Associate Director is
responsible for Center’s everyday management.
The Liaison Officer is appointed jointly by JAMSTEC and NASDA to
facilitate communication and coordination among UH, JAMSTEC and NASDA, and to
oversee management of Japanese funds.
Mechanisms of external
review and guidance are provided by the Science Advisory Committee (SAC), the
Implementation Committee (IC), and the Joint Council (JC).
1. Scientific Advisory
Committee: The
SAC advises the IPRC Director and the IC on overall scientific direction of the
IPRC. Its purpose is to ensure that the
highest possible quality of research is conducted at the IPRC. A primary SAC function of the SAC is
therefore to recommend the addition or deletion of scientific themes, goals and
objectives. The SAC is composed of
internationally respected scientists, with expertise in the areas of research
being conducted by the IPRC. The SAC
members are appointed by the JC upon recommendation from either the IC or
existing SAC memberships.
2. Implementation Committee:
The
Implementation Committee (IC) was established as one of the joint subsidiary
bodies of the Joint Council (ref. Article III of the Implementing
Arrangement). The IC is a joint
US-Japan body charged with ensuring that the IPRC is effectively
implemented. Among other things, it
annually reviews the IPRC Science Plan, Work Plan, and budget. It also makes recommendations to the JC
concerning the IPRC Director and Executive Associate Director. The members of the IPRC-IC consist of
representatives of the current participating parties of the IPRC (UH, JAMSTEC,
NASDA, NSF, NASA, NOAA, and DOE).
3. Joint Council: The Joint Council for
Global Change Research and Prediction oversees and coordinates Joint Activities
between US and Japan, which are defined in Article II of the Implementing
Arrangement. Research activities at the
IPRC are regarded as one of the Joint Activities. In principle, the JC meets once a year and operates by consensus.
Because the IPRC (or any
other single institution) cannot do everything itself, it is important that the
IPRC develop close working relationships with institutions and individual
scientists conducting research in related areas. The IPRC programs discussed below are intended to foster such
interactions.
The IPRC research should
complement and facilitate, rather than duplicate, research efforts being
conducted at other institutions.
Therefore, the IPRC should coordinate its activities with related
academic institutions, government laboratories, and non-governmental
organizations in Japan, the US, and other countries as much as possible. If appropriate, it should enter into formal
agreements with other institutions, to facilitate cooperation on problems of
mutual interest. The following example
illustrates the usefulness of such agreements.
One goal of IPRC research is to improve predictability of the
Asia-Pacific climate. Since the
validation of this research can only be accomplished by actually doing predictions,
cooperation with research and operational institutions that regularly carry out
predictions is essential. Obvious
candidate institutions are the JMA, NCEP, the IRICP and ECMWF.
The IPRC Affiliates program
is intended to expand the intellectual resources of the Center, by facilitating
close working relationships with scientists at other institutions. IPRC Affiliate Members are individuals who
have a continuing working relationship with IPRC researchers on topics of
relevance to IPRC objectives, or who actively support IPRC objectives in some
other way. Affiliate members are
appointed by the IPRC Director for three-year renewable terms. Affiliate members will receive preferential
consideration for IPRC Visitor status and use of IPRC computers, and will
regularly obtain IPRC information. IPRC
funds, however, will not otherwise be used to support Affiliates’ research
activities that take place outside the IPRC.
A Visitor program is
essential to the intellectual vitality of the IPRC. The program will support visits by external scientists for
various durations (from a week to a year or more). Requests for Visitor status should be submitted in writing to the
IPRC Director. They should include a
brief description of the planned research, and a statement of how the work is
related to IPRC objectives. All
requests must be approved by the IPRC Director. Visits longer than one week must also be approved by the IPRC
Visitors Committee.
Travel support for IPRC
scientists employed by UH and RCUH is available from two sources: i) externally funded contracts and
grants; and ii) internal IPRC funds,
if external funds are not available. If
possible, sufficient funds will be built into the IPRC annual budget to allow
IPRC scientists employed by UH and RCUH to attend scientific international
meeting (or two national meetings) each year, and tenure-track faculty to
attend two international meetings.
Requests for travel funds should be submitted to the IPRC Executive
Associate Director, together with a brief description of planned activities and
a statement of how they support IPRC objectives. Travel support for IPRC scientists who are Frontier researchers
are generally available from JAMSTEC or NASDA.
Funds will be built into the
IPRC annual budget to support meetings and workshops (“functions”) that involve
groups external to the IPRC. Such
functions are useful for the IPRC because they serve to keep IPRC scientists
abreast of the latest developments and planning. All functions supported by the IPRC should have themes that
advance IPRC objectives, and at least one IPRC scientist must be a member of
its planning committee. Requests for
IPRC support are submitted to the IPRC Director, together with an outline of the
planned activities, a discussion of how they support IPRC objectives, and a
preliminary budget. They are reviewed
and approved by the IPRC Meetings and Workshops Committee, and final approval
is by the IPRC Director. Since all such
functions will benefit IPRC
scientists (otherwise they won’t pass the internal review process), it is
reasonable that IPRC funds to support them in part. It is also reasonable to ask that functions be supported by
external agencies, since they will also benefit the community at large. Generally, it is expected that they will be
supported roughly equally between IPRC and external funding sources.
The IPRC research activities
should be clearly related to existing international research programs and
explicitly contribute to them. This is
true for the current ones, which map onto a number of the programs sponsored by
the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP), the International
Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), and global-change research initiatives
within Japan and the United States.
Given the close relationship of its research efforts to these
international programs, the IPRC should interact regularly with their advisory
bodies to determine its unique contributions.
Current IPRC activities are
perhaps most closely related to those of the Climate Variability and
Predictability (CLIVAR) and Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX)
programs sponsored by WCRP.
The overall objectives of
CLIVAR research are to improve understanding of the dominant modes of
seasonal-to-centennial climate variability, to assess anthropogenically-induced
climate changes, and ultimately to develop a system of coupled models and
long-term observations that allow skillful predictions of
seasonal-to-centennial climate variability.
With respect to the A-AMS, the CLIVAR Monsoon Panel has adopted the
following objectives for the A-AMS Implementation Plan:
·
To
document the spatial structure and temporal variability of the AA-monsoon
system on intraseasonal, annual, interannual and interdecadal time scales
·
To
identify specific mechanisms in the complex evolution of the annual cycle in
the coupled ocean-atmosphere-land system in the monsoon regions
·
To
unravel the mechanisms of the intraseasonal oscillations (ISO) affecting the
monsoon regions and the Indian and western Pacific warm pool
·
To
determine the fundamental modes and mechanisms in ENSO-Monsoon coupling,
including the Tropospheric Biennial Oscillations (TBO) and interdecadal
modulations
·
To
quantify the relative roles of oceanic processes in different ocean basins, and
land processes, in determining monsoon variability
·
To
determine the relative contribution of the chaotic vs. deterministic, as well
as local vs. remote forcing in contribution to monsoon predictability
·
To
identify external influences including tropical-extratropical and
tropospheric-stratospheric interactions affecting monsoon variations
These CLIVAR objectives mesh
well with all the IPRC themes, goals and objectives.
The
overall objective of the GEWEX program is to observe, understand and model the
hydrological cycle and energy fluxes globally within the atmosphere, at the
land surface, and in the upper ocean.
The ongoing GEWEX Asian Monsoon Experiment (GAME) is responsible for
obtaining necessary observations in the A-AMS region. The objectives of GAME are to understand the role of the Asian
monsoon as a major component of the global energy and water cycle, to determine
the feedback processes associated with monsoon variability, and thereby to
improve the seasonal forecasting of monsoon and regional water resources. The planned South China Sea Monsoon
Experiment (SCSMEX) has similar objectives, but is focussed on the South China
Sea. The IPRC activities under Themes 3
and 4 will complement and enhance GAME and SCSMEX observational programs in the
areas of data analysis and modeling.
Alexander, M.A., 1992a:
Midlatitude atmosphere-ocean interaction during El Niño. Part I: The North Pacific Ocean. J. Clim., 5, 944-958.
Alexander, M.A., 1992b:
Midlatitude atmosphere-ocean interaction during El Niño. Part II: The northern hemisphere atmosphere. J. Clim.,
5, 959-972.
Barnett, T. P., 1983:
Interaction of the monsoon and Pacific trade wind system at interannual time
scales. Part I: The equatorial zone. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 111, 756-773.
Barnett, T.P., 1991: The
interaction of multiple time scales in the tropical climate system. J. Clim., 4, 269-285.
Barnett, T.P., D.W. Pierce,
M. Latif, D. Dommenget, and R. Saravanan, 1999: Interdecadal interactions between
the tropics and midlatitudes in the Pacific basin. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
615-618.
Barnett, T.P., L. Dumenil, U.
Schlese, E. Roeckner and M. Latif, 1983: Interaction of the monsoon and Pacific
trade wind system at interannual time scales. Part I: The equatorial zone., Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 756-773.
Barnett, T.P., L. Dumenil, U.
Schlese, E. Roeckner, and M. Latif, 1989: The effect of Eurasian snow cover on
regional and global climate variations. J.
Atmos. Sci., 46, 661-685.
Barsugli, J. J. and D. S. Battisti,
1998: The basic effects of atmosphere-ocean thermal coupling on mid-latitude
variability. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 477-493.
Battisti, D.S. and A.C.
Hirst, 1989: Interannual variability in the tropical atmosphere/ocean system:
Influence of the basic state and ocean geometry. J. Atmos. Sci., 46,
1687-1712.
Behera, SK, P.S. Salver and
T. Yamagata, 1999: Simulation of interannual SST variability in the tropical
Indian Ocean. (Unpublished manuscript.)
Behringer D., L. Regier and
H. Stommel, 1979: Thermal feedback on wind-stress as a contributing cause of
the Gulf Stream. J. Mar. Res., 37, 699-709.
Bhaskharan and Mitchell,
1998. Simulated changes in the intensity and variability of the southeast Asian
monsoon in the twenty first century resulting from anthropogenic emissions
scenarios. Submitted. Int. J. Clim.
Bingham, F. and R. Lukas,
1994: The Southward Intrusion of North Pacific Intermediate Water along the
Mindanao Coast. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 141-154.
Brancovic, C., T.N. Palmer
and L. Ferranti, 1994: Predictability of seasonal atmospheric variations. J. Clim., 7, 217-237.
Cessi, P., 2000: Thermal
feedback on wind stress as a contributing cause of climate variability. J. Clim., 13, 232-244.
Chang, C.-P. and K.G. Lum,
1985: Tropical-midlatitude interactions over Asia and the western Pacific Ocean
during the 1983/84 northern winter. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 113, 1345-1358.
Chang, C.-P., and T. Li,
1999: A theory for the tropical tropospheric biennial oscillation. Submitted to
J. Atmos. Sci.
Charney, J.G. and J. Shukla,
1981: Predictability of monsoons. In Monsoon Dynamics, Cambridge University
Press, 99-110.
Chase, T.N., R.A. Pielke,
T.G.F. Kittel, R. Nemani, and S.W. Running, 1996: Sensitivity of a general
circulation model to global changes in leaf area index. J. Geophys. Res., 101,
7393-7408.
Chelton, D.B. and M.G.
Schlax, 1996: Global observations of oceanic Rossby waves. Science, 272, 234-238.
Chelton DB, Esbensen SK,
Schlax G, Thum N, Freilich MH, Wentz FJ, Gentemann CL, McPhaden MJ, and Schopf
PS, 2001: Observations of coupling between surface wind stress and sea surface
temperature in the eastern tropical Pacific. J. Clim., 14, 1479-1498.
Chen, L.-X., M. Dong, and
Y.-N. Shao, 1992: The characteristics of interannual variations on the East
Asian monsoon. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,
70, 397-421.
Clarke, A. J., X. Liu, and G.
V. Stephen, 1997: Dynamics of the biennial oscillation in the equatorial Indian
and far western Pacific Oceans. J.
Climate, 11, 987-1001.
CLIVAR Monsoon Panel, 1997:
CLIVAR Asian-Australian Monsoon Implementation Plan (AAMIP). Draft of February
9, 1997.
Cornejo-Garrido, A.G. and
P.H. Stone, 1977: On the heat balance of the Walker circulation. J. Atm. Sci., 34, 1155-1162.
da Silva, A.M., C.C. Young,
and S. Levitus, 1994: Atlas of surface marine data 1994, Vols. 1 and 3. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 6 and 8, NOCD,
NOAA/NESDIS E/OC21, Washington, DC 20235.
Davey, M.K., D.L.T. Anderson
and S. Lawrence, 1996: A simulation of variability of ENSO forecast skill. J. Clim., 9, 240-246.
Deser, C., M.A. Alexander,
and M.S. Timlin, 1996: Upper ocean thermal variations in the North Pacific
during 1970-1991. J. Clim., 9, 1840-1855.
Deser, C., M. A. Alexander
and M. S. Timlin, 1999: Evidence for a wind-driven intensification of the
Kuroshio Current Extension from the 1970s to the 1980s. J. Clim., 12, 1697-1706.
Ding, Y., 1994: Monsoons over China. Kluver Academic
Publishers, 419 pp.
Drosdowsky, W., 1996:
Variability of the Australian Summer Monsoon at Darwin: 1957-1992. J. Clim., 9, 85-96.
Ebuchi N. and K. Hanawa,
2000: Mesoscale Eddies Observed by {TOLEX-ADCP} and TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimeter in
the Kuroshio Recirculation Region South of Japan, J. Oceanogr., 56, 43-57.
Feng, M., H. Mitsudera, and
Y. Yoshikawa, 1999: Structure and variability of the Kuroshio Current in the
Tokara Strait. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
(Submitted.)
Feng, M., H. Mitsudera, and
Y. Yoshikawa, 2000: Structure and variability of the Kuroshio current in Tokara
Strait. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30,
2257-2276.
Ferranti, L., J. M. Slingo,
T. N. Palmer, and B. Hoskins, 1997: Relations between interannual and
intraseasonal monsoon variability as diagnosed from AMIP integrations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 1323-1357.
Fine, R.A., R. Lukas, F.M.
Bingham, M.J. Warner and R.H. Gammon, 1994: The western equatorial Pacific is a
water mass crossroads. J. Geophys. Res.,
99, 25063-25080.
Flatau, M., P. J. Flatau, P.
Phoebus, and P. P. Niiler, 1997: The feedback between equatorial convection and
local radiative and evaporative processes: The implications for intraseasonal
oscillations. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2373-2386.
Frankignoul, C., E.
Kestenare, N. Sennechael, G. de
Coetlogon and F. D'Andrea, 2000: On decadal-scale ocean-atmosphere interactions
in the extended ECHAM1/LSG climate simulation. Clim. Dyn., 16, 333-354.
Giambelluca, T.W., 1996:
Tropical landcover change: Characterizing the post-forest land surface. in
Climate Change: Developing Southern Hemisphere Perspectives. T.W. Giambelluca
and A. Henderson-Sellers, eds., J. Wiley & Sons. UK, 293-318.
Giambelluca, T.W., L.T. Tran,
A.L. Ziegler, T.P. Menard and M.A. Nullet, 1996: Soil-vegetation-atmospheric
processes: Simulation and field measurement for deforested sites in northern
Thailand. J. Geophys. Res. (Atm.), 101, 25,867-25, 885.
Godfrey, J.S., 1996: The
effect of the Indonesian throughflow on ocean circulation and heat exchange
with the atmosphere: A review. J.
Geophys. Res., 101,
12,217-12,238.
Gordon, A.L., 1986:
Inter-ocean exchange of thermocline water. J.
Geophys. Res., 91, 5037-5946.
Gouriou, Y. and J.M. Toole,
1993: Mean circulation of the upper layers of the western equatorial Pacific
Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 22,495-22,520.
Graham, N.E., 1994:
Decadal-scale climate variability in the tropical and North Pacific during the
1970s and 1980s: observations and model results. Clim. Dyn., 10, 135-162
Graham, N.E., T.P. Barnett,
R. Wilde, M. Ponater, and S. Schubert, 1994: On the roles of tropical and
midlatitude SSTs in forcing interannual to interdecadal variability in the
winter northern hemisphere circulation. J.
Clim., 7, 1416-1441.
Gray, W.M., 1968: Global view
of the origin of tropical disturbances and storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 96,
669-700.
Gu, D. and S.G.H. Philander,
1997: A theory for interdecadal climate fluctuations. Science, 275, 805-807.
Hahn, D. and J. Shukla, 1976:
An apparent relationship between Eurasian snow cover and Indian monsoon
rainfall. J. Atmos. Sci., 33,
2461-2463.
Hanawa, K., Y. Yoshikawa and
T. Taneda, 1996: TOLEX-ADCP monitoring.
Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2429-2432.
Hanawa, K., Y. Yoshikawa and
T. Watanabe, 1989: Composite analyses of wintertime wind stress vector fields
with respect to SST anomalies in the western North Pacific and the ENSO events.
Part I: SST composite. J. Met. Soc. Japan, 67, 385-400.
He, J.-H., J. W. McGinnis,
Z.-S. Song, and M. Yanai, 1987: Onset of the Asian summer monsoon in 1979 and
the effects of the Tibetan Plateau. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 115, 1966-1995.
Hendon, H.H. and B. Liebmann,
1990a: A composite study of onset of the Australian summer monsoon. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2227-2240.
Hendon, H.H. and B. Liebmann,
1990b: The intraseasonal (30-50 day) oscillation of the Australian summer
monsoon. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2909-2923.
Hirst, A.C. and J.S. Godfrey,
1993: The response to a sudden change in Indonesian Throughflow in a global
ocean GCM, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 1895-1910.
Hirst, A.C. and K. M. Lau,
1990: Intraseasonal and interannual oscillations in coupled ocean-atmosphere
models. J. Clim., 3, 713-725.
Hirst, A.C., D.R. Jackett and
T.J. McDougall, 1996: The meridional overturning cells of an ocean model in
neutral density coordinates. J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 26, 775-791.
Holland, G.J., 1995: Scale
interaction in the western Pacific monsoon. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 56, 57-79.
Holland, G.J., 1997: The
maximum potential intensity of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci., 54,
2519-2541.
Honda, M., K.
Yamazaki, Y. Tachibana, and K. Takeuchi, 1996: Influence of Okhotsk sea-ice
extent on atmospheric circulation.
Geophys. Res. Lett., 23,
3595-5398.
Hsu, H.-H., B. J. Hoskins,
and F.-F. Jin, 1990: The 1985/86 intraseasonal oscillation and the role of the
extratropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 823-839.
Huang, R.X., 1990: Does
Atmospheric Cooling Drive the Gulf Stream Recirculation? J. Phys. Oceanogr., 20,
750-757.
Hurlburt, H. E., A. J.
Wallcraft, W. J. Schmitz Jr., P. J. Hogan and E. J. Metzger, 1996: Dynamics of
the Kuroshio/Oyashio current system using eddy-resolving models of the North
Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 941-976.
Ichikawa, K., 2000: Variation
of the Kuroshio in the Tokara Strait induced by mesoscale eddies. J.
Oceanogr. (In press.)
Inatsu, M., H. Mukougawa and
S.-P. Xie, 2002: Tropical and extra-tropical SST effects on the mid-latitude
storm tracks. J. Met. Soc. Japan, 80, 1069-1976.
Imawaki, S., H. Ichikawa, M.
Fukasawa, S. Umatani, and ASUKA group, 1997: Time series of the Kuroshio
transport derived from field observations and altimetry data. International WOCE Newsletter, 25, 15-18.
Iwasaka, N., K. Hanawa, and
Y. Toba, 1988: Partition of the North Pacific Ocean based on similarity in
temporal variation of the SST anomaly. J.
Met. Soc. Japan, 66, 433-443.
Iwasaki, T. and H. Kitagawa,
1997: Extended forecast experiments of the Asian Monsoon using a global NWP
model with a cloud scheme different between land and ocean. Preprint of
Abstracts of Papers for the First WMO International Workshop on Monsoon
Studies, Bali Island, Indonesia, 24-28 February, 1997. WMO/TD-786, 86-89.
Jacobs, G.A., H.E. Hurlburt,
J.C. Kindle, E.J. Metzger, J.L. Mitchell, W.J. Teague, and A.J. Wallcraft,
1994: Decade-scale trans-Pacific propagation and warming effects of an El Niño
anomaly. Nature, 370, 360-363.
Jameson, L. and T. Miyama,
1999: Wavelet analysis and ocean modeling: a dynamically adaptive numerical
method. Mon. Wea. Rev. (In press.)
Jin, F.-F., M. Kimoto, and X.-C.
Wang, 1998: Decadal to interdecadal ocean-atmosphere interaction in the Pacific
basin. (Unpublished manuscript.)
Ju, J. and J. Slingo, 1995:
The Asian summer monsoon and ENSO. Quart.
J. Roy. Met. Soc., 121, 1133-1168.
Kagimoto, T. and T. Yamagata,
1997: Seasonal transport variations of the Kuroshio: a OGCM simulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 403-418.
Kashino, Y. , H. Watanabe, B.
Herunadi, M. Aoyama, and D. Hartoyo, 1999: Current variability at the Pacific
entrance of the Indonesian Throughflow. J.
Geophys. Res., 104, 11021-11035.
Kitoh, A. and K. Yamazaki,
1991: Impact of surface drag of island in the maritime continent on the
atmospheric general circulation. J. Met.
Soc. Japan, 69, 241-249.
Kitoh, A., S. Yukimoto, A.
Noda and T. Motoi, 1997: Simulated changes in the Asian summer monsoon at times
of increased atmospheric CO2. J.
Meteorol. Soc. Japan, 75,
1019-1031.
Kleeman, R., and S.B. Power,
1999: Modulation of ENSO variability on decadal and longer timescales. In: El Niño and the Southern Oscillation:
Multiscale variability and its impacts on natural ecosystems and society,
edited by H.F. Diaz and Z. Markgraf, Cambridge University Press, pp. 373-399.
Kleeman, R., J.P. McCreary,
and B.A. Klinger, 1999: A mechanism for generating ENSO decadal variability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1743-1746.
Kleeman, R., R. Colman, N.R.
Smith, and S.B. Power, 1996: A recent change in the mean state of the Pacific
basin climate: Observational evidence and atmospheric and oceanic responses. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 20,483-20,499.
Knutson, T.R. and S. Manabe,
1998: Model assessment of decadal variability and trends in the tropical
Pacific Ocean. J. Clim., 11, 2273-2296.
Knutson, T.R., S. Manabe and
D. Gu, 1998: Simulated ENSO in a global coupled ocean-atmosphere model:
Multidecadal amplitude modulation and CO2 sensitivity. J.
Clim., 10, 138-161.
Kripalani, R.H. and A.
Kulkarni, 1996: Interannual and decadal rainfall variability over Southeast
Asia - connections with Indian Monsoon and ENSO extremes: New perspectives. Int. J. Climatol. (Accepted.)
Krishnamurti, T. N. and H. N.
Bhalme, 1976: Oscillations of a monsoon system. Part I: Observational aspects. J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1937-1954.
Krishnamurti, T. N., P. K.
Jayakumar, J. Sheng, N. Surgi, and A. Kumar, 1985: Divergent circulations on
the 30- to 50-day time scales. J. Atmos.
Sci., 42, 364-375.
Krishnan, R., and M.
Mujumdar, 1999: Remotely and regionally forced pre-monsoon signals over
northern India and neighborhood. Quat. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 55-78.
Kuo, H.-C., J.-H. Chen, R.T.
Williams, and C.-P. Chang, 2001: Rossby wave in zonally opposing mean flow:
Behavior in northwest Pacific summer monsoon. J. Atmos. Sci., in press.
Kushnir Y, Robinson WA, Blade
I, Hall NMJ, Peng S, Sutton R, 2002: Atmospheric GCM response to extratropical
SST anomalies: Synthesis and evaluation. J.
Clim., 15, 2233-2256.
Lal, M., U. Cubasch, R. Voss
and J. Waszkewitz, 1995: Effect of transient increase in greenhouse gases and
sulphate aerosols on monsoon climate, Current
Science, 69, 752-763.
Latif, M. and T.P. Barnett,
1994: Causes of decadal climate variability over the North Pacific and North
America. Science, 266, 634-637.
Latif, M. and T.P. Barnett,
1996: Causes of decadal variability over the North Pacific and North America:
Dynamics and predictability. J. Clim.,
9, 2407-2423.
Latif, M., R. Kleeman, and C.
Eckart, 1997: Greenhouse warming, decadal variability or El Niño? An attempt to
understand the anomalous 1990s. J. Clim.,
10, 2221-2239.
Lau, K.M. and J.S. Boyle,
1987: Tropical and extratropical forcing of the large-scale circulation: A
diagnostic study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 400-428.
Lau, K.-M. and S. Yang 1996:
The Asian monsoon and predictability of the tropical ocean-atmosphere system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 945-957.
Lau, K.-M., and P. J. Sheu
1988: Annual cycle, quasi-biennial oscillation, and Southern Oscillation in
global precipitation. J. Geophys. Res.,
93, 10975-10988.
Lau, K.-M., and H. Weng,
1999: Interannual, decadal-to-interdecadal and global warming signals in sea
surface temperature during 1955-1997. J.Clim.,
12, 1257-1267.
Lau, L.-M. and S. Yang, 1996:
Seasonal variation, abrupt transition, and intraseasonal variability associated
the Asian Summer Monsoon in the GLA GCM. J.
Clim., 9, 965-985.
Lau, N.-C. and M.J. Nath, 1990:
A general circulation model study of the atmospheric response to extratropical
SST anomalies observed in 1950-79. J.
Clim., 3, 965-989.
Lau, N-C, 1988: Variability
of the observed midlatitude storm tracks in relation to low-frequency changes
in the circulation patterns. J. Atmos.
Sci., 45, 2718-2743.
Levitus, S., and T.P. Boyer,
1994: World Ocean Atlas 1994, Vols. 1-4.
NOAA/NESDIS/NODC/OCL, Washington, D.C.
Li, C. and M. Yanai, 1996:
The onset and interannual variability of the Asian Summer Monsoon in relation
to land-sea thermal contrast. J. Clim.,
9, 358-375.
Li, T., and C.-P. Chang,
1999: Nonlinear interactions between the tropical Biennial oscillation and
ENSO. Preprint, XXII conference on the Hurricane and Tropical Meteorology,
Dallas, TX, January 1999.
Liu, Z., S.G.H. Philander,
and R.C. Pacanowski, 1994: A GCM study of tropical-subtropical supper-ocean
water exchange. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 2606-2623.
Liu, Z.Y., and S.I. Shin,
1999: On thermocline ventilation of active and passive tracers. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 357-360.
Loschnigg, J., and P. J.
Webster, 1996: Sea surface temperature regulation in the Indian Ocean: A
counterpoint to the Pacific warm pool. Conf.
On GOALS, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Atlanta, GA.
Lu, P., and J.P. McCreary,
Jr., 1995: Influence of the ITCZ on the flow of thermocline water from the
subtropical to the equatorial Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25,
3076-3088.
Lu, P., J.P. McCreary, Jr.,
and B.A. Klinger, 1998: Meridional circulations cells and the source waters of
the Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent. J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 62-84.
Lukas, R., and E. Lindstrom,
1991: The mixed layer of the western equatorial Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 3343-3357.
Lukas, R., T. Yamagata and
J.P. McCreary, 1996: Pacific low-latitude western boundary currents. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 12209-12216.
Madden , R. A., and P. R.
Julian, 1972: Description of global-scale circulation cells in the tropics with
a 40-50 day period. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1109-1123.
Madden, R. A., 1986: Seasonal
variations of the 40-50-day oscillation in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 43,
3138-3158.
Madden, R. A., and P. R.
Julian, 1971: Detection of a 40-50 day oscillation in the zonal wind in the
tropical Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 702-708.
Magana, V., and M. Yanai,
1991: Tropical-midlatitude interaction on the time scale of 30-60 days during
the northern summer of 1979. J. Climate,
4, 180-201.
Mann, M.E., and J. Park,
1996: Joint spatiotemporal modes of surface temperature and sea level pressure
variability in the northern hemisphere during the last century. J. Clim., 9, 2137-2162.
Mantua, N.J. and D.S.
Battisti, 1995: Aperiodic variability in the Zebiak-Cane coupled
ocean-atmosphere model: Air-sea interactions in the western equatorial Pacific.
J. Clim., 8, 2897-2927.
Masumoto, Y. and T. Yamagata,
1991: The response of the western tropical Pacific to the Asian winter monsoon:
The generation of the Mindanao Dome. J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 1386-1398.
Masuzawa, J. and K. Nagasaki,
1975: The 137°E oceanographic section. J.
Mar. Res., 33 (suppl.), 109-116.
Masuzawa, J., 1968: Second
cruise for CSK, Ryofu Maru, January to March 1968. Oceanogr. Mag., 20,
173-185.
Masuzawa, J., 1969: The
Mindanao Current. Bull. Jap. Soc. Fish.
Oceanogr., Spec. No. (Prof. Uda's Comm. Papers), 99-104.
Maximenko, N. A., Y. A.
Ivanov, M. N. Koshlyakov, G. G. Panteleev and M. I. Yaremchuk, 2000:
Hydrophysical experiment "Megapolygon-87" in the North Western
Pacific subarctic frontal zone. J.
Geophys. Res. (Submitted.)
Maximenko, N.A., G.G.
Panteleev, P.P. Niiler, and T. Yamagata, 1998; Surface currents in the North
Western Pacific from WOCE/TOBA drifters, Proceedings of The International
Symposium TRIANGLE’98, Kyoto, Japan, 81-90.
Maximenko, N.A., and A.
Shcherbina, 1996: Finestructure of intermediate waters in the North Western
Pacific. Meteorology and Hydrology, 7,
71-77.
McCreary, J. and P. Lu, 1994:
On the interaction between the subtropical and equatorial ocean circulations:
The subtropical cell. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
24, 466-497
McCreary, J.P., P.K. Kundu,
and R.L. Molinari, 1993: A numerical investigation of dynamics thermodynamics
and mixed-layer processes in the Indian Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr., 31,
181-244.
McPhaden MJ, Zhang DX, 2002:
Slowdown of the meridional overturning circulation in the upper Pacific Ocean.
Nature, 415, 603-608.
Meehl, G.A., 1987: The annual
cycle and interannual variability in the tropical Pacific and Indian Ocean
regions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 27-50.
Meehl, G. A., 1993: A coupled
air-sea biennial mechanism in the tropical Indian and Pacific regions: role of
the ocean. J. Climate, 6, 31-41.
Meehl, G. A., 1994: Coupled
land-ocean-atmosphere processes and South Asian monsoon variability. Science, 266, 263-267.
Meehl, G. A., 1997: The South
Asian monsoon and the tropospheric biennial oscillation. J. Climate, 10,
1921-1943.
Meehl, G.A. and W.M.
Washington, 1993: South Asian summer monsoon variability in a model with
doubled atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Science, 260, 1101-1104.
Meehl, G.A. and W.M.
Washington, 1996: El Niño-like climate change in a model with increased
atmospheric CO2
concentrations. Nature, 382, 56-60.
Meehl, G.A., G.W. Branstator,
and W.M. Washington, 1993: Tropical Pacific interannual variability and CO2 climate change. J. Clim., 6, 42-63.
Meehl, G.A., J.M., Arblaster,
and W.G. Stand, 1998: Global scale decadal climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3983-3986.
Meehl, G.A., W. Collins, B.
Boville, J.T. Kiehl, T.M.L Wigley, and J.M. Arblaster, 1999: Response of the
NCAR Climate System Model to increased CO2 and the role of physical processes. J. Clim. (Submitted.)
Meehl, G.A., W.M. Washington,
D.J. Erickson III, B.P. Briegleb, and P.J. Jaumann, 1996: Climate change from
increased CO2 and the direct and indirect effects of sulfate aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 3755-3758.
Metzger, E.J., and H.E.
Hurlburt, 1996: Coupled dynamics of the South China Sea, the Sulu Sea, and the
Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 12,331-12,352.
Miller, A.J., D.R. Cayan, and
W.B. White 1998: A westward-intensified decadal change in the North Pacific
thermocline and gyre-scale circulation. J.
Clim., 11, 3112-3127.
Miller, A. J., D. R. Cayan,
T. P. Barnett, N. E. Graham and J. M. Oberhuber, 1994: Interdecadal variability
of the Pacific Ocean: Model response to observed heat flux and wind stress
anomalies. Climate Dynamics, 9, 287-302.
Miller, A. J. and N.
Schneider, 2000: Interdecadal climate regime dynamics in the North Pacific
Ocean: 260} Theories, observations and ecosystem impacts. Prog. Oceanogr., 27,
355-379.
Mitchell, J.F.B., and T.C.
Johns, 1997: On modification of global warming by sulfate aerosols, J. Clim., 10, 245-267.
Mitchell, J.F.B., Johns,
T.C., Gregory, J.M., and Tett, S.F.B., 1995: Climate response to increasing
levels of greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols. Nature, 376, 501-504.
Mitchum, G. and R. Lukas,
1990: Westward propagation of annual sea level and wind signals in the western
Pacific Ocean. J. Clim., 3, 1102-1110.
Mitsudera, H., Y. Yoshikawa,
B. Taguchi, and H. Nakamura. 1998: Simulation of the Kuroshio and Oyashio
System. In: Proceedings of International
symposium on decadal and inter-decadal changes of the Pacific and Indian
Oceans: Triangle 98.
Mitsudera, H., T. Waseda, B.
Taguchi, and Y. Yoshikawa, 2000a: Anticyclonic eddies and Kuroshio meander
formation. Geophys. Res. Lett.
(Submitted.)
Mitsudera, H., Y. Yoshikawa,
B. Taguchi, and H. Nakamura, 2000b: Modeling the Kuroshio and Oyashio
Confluence. (In preparation.)
Mooley, D. A., and B.
Parthasarathy, 1984: Fluctuations in all-Indian summer monsoon rainfall during
1871-1978. Climate Change, 6, 287-301.
Münnich, M., M. Latif, S.
Venske, and E. Maier-Reimer, 1997: Decadal oscillations in a simple coupled
model. (Unpublished manuscript.)
Murakami, T., 1987:
Intraseasonal atmospheric teleconnection patterns during the Northern
Hemisphere winter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 2133-2154.
Murakami, T., L.-X. Chen and
A. Xie, 1986: Relationship among seasonal cycles, low-frequency oscillations,
and transient disturbances. Mon. Wea. Rev.,
114, 1456-1465.
Murtugudde, R., and A.J.
Busalacchi, 1999: Interannual variability of the dynamics and thermodynamics of
the tropical Indian Ocean. J. Clim.
(In press.)
Murtugudde, R., J.P.
McCreary, and A.J. Busalacchi, 1999: Oceanic processes associated with
anomalous events in the Indian Ocean with relevance to 1997-1998. J. Geophys. Res. (Under review.)
Nakamura, H., and T.
Yamagata, 1999: Recent decadal SST variability in the Northwestern Pacific and
associated atmospheric anomalies. In: Beyond
El Niño: Decadal Climate Variability, edited by A. Navarra, pp. 69-92.
Nakamura, H., G. Lin, and T.
Yamagata, 1997: Decadal climate variability in the North Pacific during the
recent decades. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc.,
78, 2215-2225.
Nakamura. T., T. Awaji, T.
Hatayama, K. Akitomo, T. Takizawa, 2000. Tidal Exchange through the Kuril
Straits pages. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 1622-1644.
National Research Council,
1996: A plan for a research program on aerosol radiative forcing and climate
change. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 161 pp.
Nicholls, N., 1978: Air-sea
interaction and quasi-biennial oscillation. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 106, 1505-1508.
Nicholls, N., 1989: Sea
surface temperature and Australian winter rainfall. J. Clim., 2, 965-973.
Nicholls, N., 1995: All-India
summer Monsoon rainfall and sea surface temperature around northern Australia
and Indonesia. J. Clim., 8, 1463-1467.
Nitani, H., 1970:
Oceanographic conditions in the sea east of the Philippines and Luzon Strait in
summers of 1965 and 1966. in The Kuroshio, A Symposium on the Japan Current,
ed. J.C. Marr, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, 213-232.
Nitani, H., 1972: Beginning
of the Kuroshio. in Kuroshio: Physical aspects of the Japan Current., H.
Stommel and K. Yoshida, eds., U. Washington Press, 129-163.
Nitta, T., 1987: Convective activities
in the tropical western Pacific and their impacts on the Northern Hemisphere
summer circulation. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,
65, 373-390.
Nitta, T., and
S. Yamada, 1989: Recent warming of tropical sea surface temperature and its
relationship to the Northern Hemisphere circulation. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 72,
823-831.
Nitta. T. and Z.-Z. Hu, 1996:
Summer climate variability in China and its association with 500 hPa height and
tropical convection. J. Met. Soc. Japan,
74, 425-445.
Noda, A., K. Yamaguchi, S.
Yamaki, and S. Yukimoto, 1999: Relationship between natural variability and CO2-induced warming pattern: MRI
AOGCM experiment. Preprint Volume of the 10th Symposium on Global Change
Studies , 10-15 January 1999, Dallas, Texas.
Nonaka M, Xie SP, McCreary JP,
2002: Decadal variations in the subtropical cells and equatorial pacific SST.
Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1116, DOI
10.1029/2001GL013676.
Nonaka, M., and S.-P. Xie:
Co-variations of sea surface temperature and wind over the Kuroshio and its
extension: Evidence for ocean-to-atmospheric feedback. J. Climate, in
press.
Normand, 1953: Monsoon
seasonal forecasting. Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc.,
79, 463-473.
Ose, T., S. Yukuan and A.
Kitoh, 1996: South China Sea and Asian monsoon in the MRI-AGCM simulation.
Proceedings of International Workshop on the Climate System of Monsoon Asia,
December 3-7, 1996. 178-181.
Palmer, T.N., 1993: Extended
range prediction and the Lorenz model. Bull.
Am. Met. Soc., 74, 49-65.
Palmer, T.N., C. Brankovic,
P. Viterbo and M.J. Miller, 1992: Modeling interannual variations of summer
monsoons. J. Clim., 5, 399-417.
Peng, S., A. Robinson, and
M.P. Hoerling, 1997: The modeled atmospheric response to mid latitude SST
anomalies and its dependence on background circulation states. J. Clim., 10, 971-987.
Philander, S. G. H., D. Gu,
D. Halpern, G. Lambert, N-.C Lau, T. Li, and R. C. Pacanowski, 1996: Why the
ITCZ is mostly north of the equator. J.
Climate, 9, 2958-2972.
Pierce,
D. W., T. Barnett, N. Schneider, R. Saravanan, D. Dommenget and M. Latif, 2001:
The role of ocean dynamics in producing decadal climate variability in the
North Pacific. Clim. Dyn., in press.
Qiu, B. and W. Miao, 1999:
Kuroshio path variations south of Japan: Bimodality as a shelf-sustained
internal oscillation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. (Submitted.)
Qiu, B., and T.M. Joyce,
1992: Interannual variability in the mid- and low-latitude western North
Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 22, 1062-1079.
Qiu, B., 2000: Interannual
variability of the Kuroshio Extension system and its impact on the wintertime
SST field. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 1486-1502.
Qiu. B. and W. Miao, 2000:
Kuroshio Path Variations South of Japan: Bimodality as a Self-Sustained
Internal Oscillation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
30, 2124-2137.
Qu, T., G. Meyers, S. J.
Godfrey, and D. Hu, 1994: Ocean dynamics in the region between Australia and
Indonesia and its influence on the variation of sea surface temperature in a
global GCM, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 18433-18445.
Qu, T., T. Kagimoto, and T.
Yamagata, 1997: A subsurface countercurrent along the east coast of Luzon, Deep-Sea Res., Part I, 44, 413-423.
Qu, T., H. Mitsudera, and T.
Yamagata, 1999: A climatology of the circulation and water mass distribution
near the Philippine coast, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 29, 1488-1505.
Qu, T., H. Mitsudera, and B.
Qiu, 2000a: A climatological view of the Kuroshio/Oyashio system east of Japan,
J. Phys. Oceanogr. (in press).
Qu, T., H. Mitsudera, and T.
Yamagata, 2000b: Intrusion of the North Pacific waters into the South China
Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6415-6424.
Rasmusson, E.M., X. Wang and
C.F. Ropelewski, 1990: The biennial component of ENSO variability. J. Mar. Syst., 1, 71-96.
Rikiishi, K.,
and H. Iida, 1990: On the oceanic influence on Yamase. Kaiyo Extra No.3, 55-60 (in Japanese).
Ritchie, E.A, and Holland,
G.J, 1998: Large-scale patterns associated with tropical cyclogenesis in the
western Pacific. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 2027-2043.
Ropelewski, C.F., M.S.
Halpert and X. Wang, 1992: Observed tropospheric biennial variability and its
relationship to the Southern Oscillation. J.
Clim., 5, 594-614.
Rothstein, L.M., R.-H. Zhang,
A.J. Busalacchi, and D. Chen, 1998: A numerical simulation of the mean water
pathways in the subtropical and tropical Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28,
322-343.
Schneider, N., 1998: The
Indonesian Throughflow and the global climate system. J. Clim., 11, 676-689.
Schneider, N., 2000: A
decadal spiciness mode in the tropics. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 257-260.
Schneider, N., A.J. Miller,
M.A. Alexander, and C. Deser, 1999: Subduction of decadal North Pacific
temperature anomalies: Observations and dynamics. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29,
1056-1070.
Schneider, N., S. Venzke,
A.J. Miller, D.W. Pierce, T.P. Barnett, C. Deser, and M. Latif, 1999: Pacific
thermocline bridge revisited. Geophys.
Res. Lett., 26, 1329-1332.
Schneider, N., A. J. Miller
and D. W. Pierce, 2002: Anatomy of North Pacific decadal variability. J. Clim., 15, 586-605.
Seager, R., D. S. Battisti,
J. Yin, N. Gordon, N. Naik, A. C. Clement and M. Cane, 2002: Is the Gulf Stream
responsible for Europe’s mild winters? Q.
J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 128, in
press.
Seager, R., Y. Kushnir, N.
Naik, M. A. Cane and J. A. Miller, 2001: Wind-driven shifts in the latitude of
the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension and generation of SST anomalies on decadal timescales.
J. Clim., 14, 4249-4265.
Shukla, J., 1987: Interannual
variability of the monsoons. in Monsoons, J.S. Fein and P.L. Stephens, eds.,
Wiley and Sons, 632 pp.
Sekine, Y., 1988: Anomalous
southward intrusion of the Oyashio east of Japan. 1 Influence of the seasonal
and interannual variations in the wind stress over the North Pacific. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 2247-2255.
Shukla, J., and D.A. Paolino,
1983: The Southern Oscillation and long range forecasting of the summer monsoon
rainfall over India. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 1830-1837.
Shukla, J., and M. Fennessy,
1994: Simulation and predictability of monsoons. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Monsoon Variability and Prediction. Trieste, Italy,
9-13 May 1994, WCRP-84, WMO/TD-No. 619, 567-575.
Solomon, A., J. McCreary, R.
Kleeman, and B. Klinger: Interannual and decadal variability in an intermediate
coupled model of the Pacific region. J. Climate, IPRC-179, in press.
Sperber, K.R. and T.N.
Palmer, 1996: Interannual tropical rainfall variability in general circulation
model simulations associated with the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison
Project. J. Clim., 9, 2727-2750.
Stern, W. and K. Miyakoda,
1995: Feasibility of seasonal forecasts inferred from multiple GCM simulations.
J. Clim., 8, 1071-1085.
Stone, P.H. and R.M. Chervin,
1984: The influence of ocean surface temperature gradient and continentality on
the Walker circulation. Part II: Prescribed global changes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 1524-1534.
Sumathipala, W.L. and T.
Murakami, 1988: Intraseasonal fluctuations in low-level meridional winds over
the South China Sea and the western Pacific and monsoon convection over
Indonesia and northern Australia. Tellus,
40A, 205-219.
Sutton,
R. and P.-P. Mathieu, 2002: Response of the atmosphere-ocean mixed-layer system
to anomalous ocean heat-flux convergences. Q.
J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 128,
1259-1275.
Talley, L.D., Y. Nagata, and
K. Okubo, 1995: North Pacific Intermediate Water in the Kuroshio/Oyashio Mixed
Water Region. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 475.
Tao, S., and L. Chen, 1987: A
review of recent research on the East Asian summer monsoon in China. Monsoon Meteorology, C.-P. Chang and T.
N. Krishnamurti, Eds., 60-92.
Tett, S., 1995: Simulation of
El Niño-Southern Oscillation-like variability in a global AOGCM and its
response to CO2 increase. J. Clim., 8, 1473-1502.
Timmermann, A., J. Oberhuber,
A. Bacher, M. Esch, M. Latif, and E. Roeckner, 1999: Increased El Niño
frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming. Nature, 398, 694-697.
Tomita, T. and T. Yasunari,
1998: Role of the Northeast winter monsoon on the Biennial Oscillation of the
ENSO/Monsoon system. J. Met. Soc. Japan,
74, 399-413.
Torrence, C., and P. J.
Webster, 1998: The annual cycle of persistence in the El Niño-Southern
Oscillation statistics. Quart. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., in press.
Trenberth, K. E., and J. W.
Hurrell, 1994: Decadal atmosphere-ocean variations in the Pacific. Clim. Dyn., 9, 303-319.
Trenberth, KE, Caron JM,
2001: Estimates of meridional atmosphere and ocean heat transports. J. Clim., 14, 3433-3443.
Ueda, H., T. Yasunari, and R.
Kawamura, 1995: Abrupt seasonal change of large-scale convective activity over
the western Pacific in the northern summer. J.
Met. Soc. Japan, 73, 795-809.
Ueno, H., and I.
Yasuda, 2000: Distribution and formation of the mesothermal structure
(temperature inversions) in the North Pacific subarctic region. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 16885-16897.
Vernekar, A.D., J. Zhou and
J. Shukla, 1995: The effect of Eurasian snow cover on the Indian Monsoon. J. Clim., 8, 248-266.
Vershell, M.A., J.C. Kindle,
and J.J. O'Brien, 1995: Effects of Indo-Pacific throughflow on the upper
tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans. J.
Geophys. Res., 100, 18409-18420.
Vinayachandran, P.N., N.H.
Saji, and T. Yamagata, 1999: Response of the equatorial Indian Ocean to an
unusual wind event during 1994. Geophys.
Res. Lett. (In press.)
Waffles, S., E. Firing, and
J. Toole, 1996: The mean structure and variability of the Mindanao Current at
8°N. J. Geophys. Res., in press.
Wainer, I. and P.J. Webster,
1996: Monsoon/El Niño-Southern Oscillation relationships in a simple coupled
ocean-atmosphere model. J. Geophys. Res.,
101, 25599-25614.
Waliser, D. E., K.-M Lau, and
J.-H. Kim, 1999: The influence of coupled sea surface temperatures on the Madden-Julian
oscillation: A model perturbation experiment. J. Atmos. Sci., 56,
333-358.
Walker, G. T., 1923:
Correlation in seasonal variations of weather, VIII. A preliminary study of
world weather (world weather I), Mem. India Meteor. Dept., 24, 75-131.
Wallace, J.M. and D.S.
Gutzler, 1981: Teleconnection in the potential height field during the northern
hemisphere winter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 784-812.
Wallace, J.M., C. Smith, and
Q. Jiang, 1990: Spatial patterns of atmosphere-ocean interaction in the northern
winter. J. Clim., 3, 990-998.
Wang, B. and X. Xu, 1997:
Northern hemisphere summer monsoon singularities and climatological
intraseasonal oscillation. J. Clim., 10, 1073-1085.
Wang, B., 1994: Climatic
regimes of tropical convection and rainfall. J. Climate, 7,
1109-1118.
Wang, B., 1995: Interdecadal
changes in El Niño onset in the last four decades. J. Climate, 8, 267-285.
Wang, B., A. Barcilon, and Z.
Fang, 1999: Stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 5-23.
Wang, B., and H. Rui, 1990a:
Synoptic climatology of transient tropical intraseasonal convection anomalies:
1975-1985. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 44, 43-61.
Wang, B., and X. Xie, 1998:
Coupled modes of the warm pool climate system: Part I: the role of the air-sea
interaction in maintaining the Madden-Julian oscillation. J. Climate, 11,
2116-2135.
Wang, B., and Z. Fang, 1996:
Chaotic oscillations of tropical climate: A dynamic system theory for ENSO. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 2786-2802.
Wang, B., and J.C.L. Chan,
2002: How the ENSO regulates tropical storm activity over the western North
Pacific. J. Clim., 15, 1643-1658.
Wang, B., R. Wu, and R.
Lukas, 1999: Roles of the western North Pacific wind variation in the
thermocline adjustment and ENSO phase transition. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 77,
1-16.
Waseda, T., H.
Mitsudera, B. Taguchi and Y. Yoshikawa, 2000a: On the eddy-Kuroshio
interaction: Initialization and evolution of the mesoscale eddies. J. Geophys. Res. (Submitted.)
Waseda, T., H.
Mitsudera, B. Taguchi and Y. Yoshikawa, 2000b: Eddy-Kuroshio interaction.
URI-ONR virtual poster session, http://www.po.gso.uri.edu/wbc/
Waseda, T., H.
Mitsudera, B. Taguchi and Y. Yoshikawa, 2000c: On the eddy-Kuroshio
interaction: Meander formation and anticyclonic eddy. (In preparation.)
Watanabe, T. and K. Mizuno,
1994: Decadal changes in the thermal structure of the North Pacific. Int. WOCE Newsl., 15, 10-13.
Watanabe, T., 1998: Long-term
variations in the western North Pacific subarctic gyre. In Long-term
variability in the North Pacific and Indian Oceans with implications for future
observations, I. Yasuda (Ed.), ESTO, Tokyo.
WCRP, 1993: Simulation and
prediction of monsoon, recent results. WCRP-80,
WMO/TD No. 546.
Webster, P.J. and R. Lukas,
1992: TOGA COARE: The Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 73, 1377-1416.
Webster, P.J. and S. Yang,
1992: Monsoon and ENSO: Selectively interactive systems. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 118,
877-926.
Webster, P.J., 1983:
Mechanisms of monsoon low-frequency variability: Surface hydrological effects. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 2110-2124.
Webster, P.J., 1987: The
elementary monsoon in Monsoons, J.S. Fein and P.L. Stephens, eds., Wiley and
Sons, 632 pp.
Webster, P.J., T.N. Palmer,
M. Yanai, V. Magana, T. Yasunari, and J. Shukla, 1998: Monsoons: Processes
predictability and the prospects for prediction. J. Geophys. Res., 103,
14,395-14,451.
Weng, W., and J.D. Neelin,
1998: On the role of ocean-atmosphere interaction in midlatitude interdecadal
variability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 167-170.
Wijffels, S.E., E. Firing, M.
Toole, 1995: The mean structure and variability of the Mindanao Current at 8N. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 18421-18435.
Wijffles, S., M.
Hall, T. Joyce, D.J. Torres, P. Hacker, and E. Firing, 1998: The multiple gyres
of the western North Pacific: a WOCE section along 149E. J. Geophys. Res., 103,
12985-13009.
Xie, S.-P., and S. G. H.
Philander, 1994: A coupled ocean-atmosphere model of relevance to the ITCZ in
the eastern Pacific. Tellus, 46A, 340-350.
Xie, S.-P., T. Kunitani, A.
Kubokawa, M. Nonaka, and S. Hosoda, 2000:
Interdecadal thermocline variability in the North Pacific from 1958-97:
A GCM simulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
30, 2798-2813.
Xie, S.-P., M. Ishiwatari, H.
Hashizume, and K. Takeuchi, 1998: Coupled ocean-atmospheric waves on the
equatorial front. Geophys. Res. Lett.,
25, 3863-3866.
Xu, W., T.P. Barnett, and M.
Latif, 1998: Decadal variability in the North Pacific as simulated in a hybrid
coupled model. J. Clim., 11, 297-312.
Yanai, M., and C. Li, 1994:
Interannual variability of the Asian summer monsoon and its relationship with
ENSO, Eurasian snow cover, and heating. Proc.
Int. Conf. On Monsoon Variability and Prediction. Trieste, Italy, WMO,
27-34.
Yanai, M., and T. Tomita,
1998: Seasonal and interannual variability of atmospheric heat sources and
moisture sinks as determined from NCEP-NCAR reanalysis. J. Climate, 11, 463-482.
Yasuda, I., K. Okuda, and Y.
Shimizu, 1996: Distribution and modification of North Pacific intermediate
water in the Kuroshio-Oyashio frontal zone. J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 448-465.
Yasuda, I., S.
Itoh, K. Ichikawa, K. Ueda, T. Honma, M. Uchiyama, K. Watanabe, T. Suno, K.
Tanaka, K. Koizumi, 1999: Cold-core anticyclonic eddies south of the Bussol’
Strait in the north-western subarctic Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr., in press.
Yasuda, I., S-I
Ito, Y. Shimizu, K. Ichikawa, K-I. Ueda, T. Honma, M. Uchiyama, K. Watanabe, N.
Sunou, K. Tanaka, K. Koizumi, 2000: Cold-Core Anticyclonic Eddies South of the
Bussol’ Strait in the Northwestern Subarctic Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30,
1137-1157.
Yasuda, T. and K. Hanawa
1997: Decadal changes in the mode waters in the mid latitude North Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 858-870.
Yasunari, T., 1979:
Cloudiness fluctuations associated with the Northern Hemisphere summer monsoon. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 57, 227-242.
Yasunari, T., 1980: A
quasi-stationary appearance of 30-40 day period in the cloudiness fluctuations
during the summer monsoon over India. J.
Meteor. Soc. Japan, 58, 225-229.
Yasunari, T., 1989: A
possible link of the QBOs between the stratosphere, troposphere and sea surface
temperature in the Tropics. J. Met. Soc.
Japan, 67, 483-493.
Yasunari, T., 1990: Impact of
Indian Monsoon on the coupled atmosphere/ocean system in the tropical Pacific. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 44, 29-41.
Yasunari, T., and R. Suppiah,
1988: Some problems on the interannual variabilities of Indonesian monsoon
rainfall. In Tropical Rainfall Measurements. Eds. J. S. Theon and N. Fugono,
pp. 113-122, Deepak, Hampton, Va.
Yoshikawa Y., M. Kim, and H.
Mitsudera, 1998: Mesoscale eddies and the Kuroshio current observed by TOPEX/
POSEIDON altimetric data. JAMSTECR, 37, 135-141.
Yuan, X., and L.D. Talley,
1996: The subarctic frontal zone in the North Pacific: characteristics of
frontal structure from climatological data and synoptic surveys. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 16941-16508.
Yukimoto, S.M. Endoh, Y.
Kitamura, A. Kitoh, T. Motoi, A. Noda and T. Tokioka, 1996: Interannual and
inderdecadal variabilities in the North Pacific in an MRI coupled GCM. Clim. Dyn., 12, 667-683.
Yukimoto, S.M., M. Endoh, Y.
Kitamura, A. Kitoh, T. Motoi, and A. Noda, 1998: Two distinct interdecadal
modes of the Pacific Ocean and atmosphere variability with a coupled GCM. J. Geophys. Res. (Submitted.)
Yulaeva, E., N. Schneider, D.
W. Pierce and T. Barnett, 2001: Modeling of North Pacific climate variability
forced by oceanic heat flux anomalies. J.
Clim., 14, 4027-4046.
Zhang, H., A.
Henderson-Sellers and K. McGuffie, 1996: Impacts of tropical deforestation.
Part I: Process analysis of local climatic change. J. Clim., 9, 1497-1517.
Zhang, R-C., and K. Hanawa,
1993: Features of the water-mass front in the Northwestern North Pacific. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 967-965.
Zhang, R., A. Sumi and M.
Kimoto, 1996: Impact of El Niño on the East Asian Monsoon: A diagnostic study
of the '86/87 and '91/92 events. J. Met.
Soc. Japan, 74, 49-62.
Zhang, Y., J.M. Wallace and
N. Iwasaka, 1996: Is climate variability over the North Pacific a linear
response to ENSO? J. Clim., 9, 1468-1478.
Zhang, Y., J.M. Wallace, and
D.S. Battisti, 1997: ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900-93. J. Clim., 10, 1004-1020.
Zhu, B., and B. Wang, 1993:
The 30-60 day convection seesaw between the tropical Indian Ocean and western
Pacific Ocean. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 184-199.
Ziegler, A.D. and T.W.
Giambelluca, 1996: Importance of rural roads as source areas for runoff in
mountainous areas of northern Thailand. J.
Hydrology (Submitted.)